Member Info for inanaco

i already have

ATB

history

Do you have any evidence that

SCIB1 will not work and keytruda has failed
SCIB2 will Fail
TCR agreement does not work
Karolinska Institutet are a bunch of idiots and have not discovered anything
Modi1 has failed
Modi2 is a con to drive up the SP
the Clycan platform is nothing more than a Tate and lyle con trick ..

what If ...

dictates what is next .......

it does not dictate an outcome positive or negative

you buy shares based on the information to hand ... not based on the information you don't have

it makes no difference to me if the SP is 3p or 10p ...

why......... i have assessed the value in the science if its taken forward as commercial .. to run into £'s

so unless you can show its NOT .......... your posts are about as useful as Mays WA agreement in a hung Parliament

Ruck loves Val401 ... he has to .. otherwise his snake oil investments look poor

I do appreciate that illiteracy is an issue for you Tommy but

""" for the simple fact if it is a gamble what is the evidence to lower risk ""

i said "if " because it allowed for people that consider it a gamble

I don't ... read what is written rather than twist it to suit ...

yes its a what if ....

we live in a world of "what if "

but we don't try and set our clocks to "what if"...... because what if .. will always follow what's done ...

you cannot buy a share with a future "whats done" at this SP ... simple

if BioNtech sign a great deal the SP will move ..

so if the SP is correct ... you are buying into "WHAT IF" ....

everyone in scancell knows that except YOU tommy

Tommy you are boring me senseless ..

come up with "tommys plan" wonderful ......... but you cannot implement "tommys plan"

you are the only person who tries to design a jigsaw puzzle .. without any pieces

Demonstrated that it can get very Flexible funding arrangements with CRUK

so is clearly open to other Non dilutive cash streams to advance the science

"what if" ...... could mean anything is possible

is all down to BioNtech

once we have a decision, are they taking it forward and what our involvement is dictates what the BOD of Scancell does next

all these funding posts are all based around "what if"

Tommy ..

your post is pure waffle ..

only good science becomes commercial ...

and i have not seen any management failure

only the TCR is at a point that Scancell cannot improve the value ... crumbs unless it does personal cancer treatment
It can only expand this with more epitopes discovered and further collaboration deals with BIoNtech or BioNtech now take on the project .. completely

you cannot change the regulatory environment

so FDA procedure cannot change

Modi1 manufacture cannot be "speeded up"

Modi2 Preclinical cannot be speeded up

SCIB2 ... CRUK knows what its doing and is putting money behind its mouth ...

TCR .. cannot be speeded up .. even with BioNtechs $270 m cash mountain ...

we are on a path .......... and it has speed restrictions for a reason we are dealing with Real People lives

So what is your message . ?

or are you standing with ONW for the "Party of Pontification"

you have no influence to change policy so what are you trying to do ?

Reason why i am not on here 24/7 ... is because NOBODY can fault the science
back in 2012 all i did was defend the science

today ? nothing

You posted

"" I am very sympathetic if that is the case but they need to grow a pair and engage in reasoned debate rather than Happy Clapping as someone on the other board calls it ""

well the only reasoned debate is the science

because that is what the BOD are following ......

anything else again is not relevant .. ie any suggestion you make that is divergent from the BOD cannot be implemented because you are not on the BOD

so your can Huff and Puff to achieve nothing ...

you cannot buy an lottery ticket and write your own winning numbers ! it is not possible

Crumbs actually most people do gamble .. which is why the lottery does so well ..

the issue with Posters on here, they keep telling folks not to gamble and sell so that they can gamble with better odds

80% of posts on here now are completely irrelevant ... for the simple fact if it is a gamble what is the evidence to lower risk

= back to the science again

sorry i thought you was referring to neo antigens not prostate

its way more complex because of the immunosuppressive environment in humans and the way that you are dealing with an individual rather than a universal antigen so when you test in mouse models you don't have the comparable individual mouse matched to the patient

quick google search reveals plenty of electroporation in mice

Don't know Crumbs i have never thought about that or seen evidence of which delivery in the mouse is used, maybe worth a search