Member Info for inanaco

there is a lead in phase .. so i would not worry about US delay, the UK arm can perform this

Fantasy politics ... i asked the question of you .

so why reply with a question ... ?

are you telling lies again ?

so we can consider the makeup of your claim

who thinks that Ruck ? or are you again playing Fantasy Politics ?

please reprint the posts you are referring to, so that we can consider your make your claim ?

"""" There are a few here who believe that Scancell will capture 100% of the cancer market, make 90% GP and the SP will be in the stratosphere no taking into account any cost of development """""

when have Scancell indicated running a Phase 3 trial ?

FDA approval

BioNtech

ATB

which is why i said you only look for storms .. Hanna is coming

Ruck i appreciate Hanna is on the way ...

No idea chap .. i only look forward

waiting the Ruckrover election for CEO campaign to start

1/ Dealing with Facts

Policy Guidance

first edition .... from your "Waffle" manifesto

"""" Expect to get treatment data by end 2020 """""

what was actually said ... "interim data will be available"

facts facts facts

Lets hope you get elected as CEO at the AGM ruck ..

you can save Scancell ..

Modi1 ... starting toxicology .. so the manufacturing issues are sorted ...

thanks for that ...

most important bit is ....... Information will be released as the trial continues .. "interim data" "open label"

approval in both markets .... ! if your confident, this is what you do !!

seeds to cloud .............

storm coming .. in thailand developing low pressure cells get named .......... "Ruckrover"

You don't read what is written ........ i was carrying out the same argument on ADFVN ..

which is why i posted ... in other words both Ruck and Bermuda trying to divert attention away from Goosed Post ..

so what i posted was this

""""and then he spent 2 hrs trying to divert attention from it .. by arguing "speculative evidence" was indeed Fact ..

or was that bermuda .. not sure """""

you then convert that to Double ID ... under "speculative evidence" .......

and i get accused of Ultra Fantasy Posting ........

all because YOU wanted a squabble with Ruck over a worthless post ...

which was not even Posted on here

who has mentioned double ID ?

The good stuff will be in RNS anyway if we get one .. hope Fri goes well C7 ..

LOL ... stop being a snowflake .. all i did was break up your petty squabbles

identified that Ruck could not find anything Novel in Goosed post ..

and then he spent 2 hrs trying to divert attention from it .. by arguing "speculative evidence" was indeed Fact ..

or was that bermuda .. not sure

so trying to claim 1/2/3 as factual statements

when "speculate the evidence" was used ..

You tried it on with TF Ruck .. and now me ..

as it's not Wimbledon yet and More evidence may be available tomorrow .. i will leave you cutting and pasting bermudas posts as your own ...