Member Info for ifiknewidberich9

Might get an early heads up from the companies house pages, Baron oil (boil) ceased to be on Monday on Companies house and is now Sunda Energy wef 1st, still no rns to market yet to officially trade now as SNDA.

The newco had a single holding page from the day of the AGM when the resolution passed to change name, the holder just a bland accountant and address stuff

The holding page for Sunda Energy was dated 21st June, the same day as the AGM, ten days would have and was change on the 1st July as per the new companies house full details page....as that page wef 1st July Boil no longer , long live Sunda Energy.

Time to RNA Update over the rns news wire , hopefully with some extra's , not just the name change officially to the market.

Sunda to give it some , Thunder , Thunder , Thunder Chud goooooooooooooo.........

The Timor NGO that overseas government actions etc, has us changed to Sunda Energy on it's website details last week

so every bugger but the market is now SNDA Sunda Energy...

Depends on how advanced they have been with the FCA , have been in companies who have changed the day after the AGM resolution being passed. Sunda Energy was open on companies house for 10 days before the holding page became the one posted, prior it was just the accountants name and address.

Expected that market RNA to have already arrived over the rns news wire, Boil officially died on 1st July per Companies House we are now Sunda Energy............

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05098776

PR groups on most co's these days a WASTE OF SPACE. Just give scripted answers based on previous releases, to see you on your way.

Plenty of time Meadow, in another which was into May , with a provisional drill slot for Jun-Aug, when the major holding the rig decided to extend until Oct-Nov, still said funding will be in time, even though only weeks away. Andy has 6 months, said he would like to have it wrapped up in Q2 which ended at the weekend but he has plenty of time to select a winning bidder, from all those , as he said "some very interesting offers" amongst the interest he has received.

Both of those companies have massive R & D Budgets and will pay top dollar, for anything, they see as giving them an advantage over the competition. Rates could be small initially but on positive early results, the game could change and dramatically, be it boosted funding or a sale/purchase of production/patent rights.

Typo - ease the pain ointment should have had an F in it , how apt.

Never ever about sp , its always about achievable Market Cap and every penny on APTA sp is only £4.67m = 1p

Working with at least Astra Zeneca and Unilever that we know of, has to have a market correction at some point.

Only me to blame , if I have shafted myself further, pays your money and takes your chance , when dealing with the Del Boy's of AIM.

Likewise early doors but should have waited 10 minutes and got it cheaper on the pullback, sods law but also with AZ being named, did not expect the pull back so quickly either. Thought 1 would have been quickly taken out......GLA

The same as he has always survived , bend over have some swargega holders , confetti dilutions with bucket shop pump and dump funding (investors stick around not leave asap) forward selling on down to a then announced lower price placing, they win every time , so does JA, paying himself to advise himself as TRP's other company advisor (freebie shares all the way putting some free advice pay back from time to time)

Once the billions of confetti shares out of control , a 100-1 consolidation and rinse repeat, JA will always have the lazy bucket shop funding , so he can eat.

When he talks Shareholders, he is only talking those who mutually scratch his back and gain forward selling down from each and every death spiral funding. Not the rest of us.

Having zero debt means zip on many aim shares , if you also have zip happening, just confetti and a falling sp.

For Golden , miracles do happen the other screwed their investors to death champions league financial fcuk wits , bell , poulden , sefton, roach , parsons, others JA is now at the top of the league with, all have had a couple , in a couple of decades, JA's incompetence , just like theirs will probably be another Miracle

Got a couple of top ups this morning, was breathing in the flooded basement with a snorkel at 0.02p , now on a voyage to the bottom of the sea, if it does turn, it will get the bends and go crazy

Many an incompetent AIM ceo has gone from massive zero to the greatest HERO.

Metinaro and Chudich made for each other and Timor need revenues.

https://www.timorgap.com/our-business/downstream/downstream-projects/

2008 Shell purpose built an FLNG ship in Korea for Sunrise production, metrics so good, Woodside who had previously purpose built a refinery 2001-03 for Sunrise at Darwin , half built when 2002 Gusmao vetoed it, Woodside took as its primary option, agreed with Shell ""the bottom line much better". Timor not interested Horta vetoed, their way or the highway, so the departure of Majors and Tier1 commenced, Shell said leaving after the 2nd refusal, finally left in 2019, when Timor stumped up a $650m petroleum fund loan to Timor Gap, to take Shell and Conoco Phillips combined 56%

Given its now Gusmao and Horta back in tandem , PM and President, thinking those studies best come back with a Timor result, or the stalemate will continue.

Thankfully , we are no longer tied to the local long running soap opera that is Sunrise, Timor Gap gone from a free carry to a paying participant in the Chuditch drill, which still has Sudagas as operator with a plan to FPSO, Timor also have a 2nd project Metinaro, which Chuditch could supply much earlier than Sunrise ever will.

Just confirms , Woodside as they said, will take another look "at all options", knowing Gusmao and co , only interested in one option, a pipeline to Timor and long term mass Timorese EMPLOYMENT at the onshore refineries.

Timor have previously turned down FLNG/FPSO and Darwin for Sunrise ,for two decades.

In the style fashion currently has the minimum required 2 directors (2d plus company sec minimum required)

Jaswinder Singh - 11 March 2024

Louise Allen - 27 March 2023

Will Brad/other icon bod stick around for a fashion house, or move on to a new project ? or will the newco (new name) be making ITSF, the first of a varied portfolio under a Group title company? , Fashion, Retail , Media etc.

Look at the TRADES on the actual markets, not a colour or label in sight, all artificially added rehashed after volume, sites like this lse trying to be helpful with trends etc , best guess all BADLY, making the volumes either side also pretty worthless.

Much better guide is

flat, small rise/fall trading pretty even

large rise , buyers demand pushing up the bid , for mm's to fill orders.

large fall , traders/sellers need to fcuk off........

Not hiding anything , the colours and buy sell unknown are all nothing to do with the MM/Market, the worlds actual markets label nothing , just print TRADES, they see as ALL being both a buy and a sell. The non researched call everything games black trades (unknown) hocus pocus etc , etc, when it is NADA to do with them.

Just 3rd party sites like this one putting a dimbo algorithm based on what it thinks is the mid price at the time, all above buy all below sell (never the case on either) everything else , exactly on its mid price, delayed trades, or it chokes also on seeing price outside of its range = UNKNOWN.

Its as simple and tragic as that, all the confusion caused by sites like this one BEST GUESSING every trade, every share, every day, likewise making the trade ratio's volumes WORTHLESS.

Its the reason so many clowns across the boards also cry , 6 times the buys to sells and we have not moved, as in reality trading is pretty even, just Dimbo Algo having a really bad day at the office.

The more than 50-page strategy, built on extensive analysis and energy market modelling by the Australian Department of Industry, Science and Resources, outlines six principles that will “underpin government policy” on gas.

The six principles can be boiled down to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050; ensuring affordable domestic supply; finding new sources of supply; supporting a shift to higher-value and non-substitutable gas uses; ensuring energy markets remain fit for purpose; and safeguarding LNG exports.

Commenting on the strategy’s launch, Australian Minister for Resources and Northern Australia Madeleine King said: “Ensuring Australia continues to have adequate access to reasonably priced gas will be key to delivering an 82% renewable energy grid by 2030, and to achieve our commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050.”

The minister added that not only would gas remain an essential source of energy for decades to come but that “it is clear we will need continued exploration, investment and development in the sector to support the path to net zero for Australia”.

Australia will now back, getting all the Gas fields in/around Australia into development for future production, hence the recent shift in attitude towards Sunrise, after two decades of stalemate.