Member Info for ID78

Looks like there is horizontal resistance at 6.50p (maybe)

But also you can draw a downward trend using the highs from:

18th Feb 21

17th November 22

15th May 24

We have broken that downtrend 👍 …

As Brad attends Beavercreek.

Could the timing be any better??!

Ahh Smokey, love it! 😂😂😂

Stop it sophisticated!! You keep making me think I’ve not bought enough here!

It is an outstanding prospect :-)

Thanks sophisticated- I like archer. He’s cleverer than me :-)

I think you all know and understand BRES. But for anyone new to BRES - I found this useful

https://substack.com/home/post/p-169447048

PaulFG - this is my issue selling OMI.

You have to have money in gold just now - and we are talking about the best one out there. So much news, so much going on. Ugggh I won’t go on - this is a BREs board.

Sold some other goldies and a bit of OMI to buy so I now hold a decent amount in BRES.

Could be more though…. Feel like it should be more tbh

Fundamentally - both are undervalued. Both will do well.

It’s not sensible to have all your eggs in one basket so I need to buy more BRES. … and I feel BRES is beginning to take off like OMI did last week….

Whereas OMI could consolidate as it has done very well…

Hey LW - I want to buy more but H&L won’t let me sell OMI at the moment (not a worrying a sign just a sign H&L are struggling to keep up with the constantly changing price I think)

Tough one - don’t want to sell OMI but it’s half my portfolio. Not sensible. So I will sell a little bit.

And then if I can do from other shares later this week then I will

Hey Kevin thanks for your comment.

Can’t remember if it’s legalwolf or TrekMadone that posted once we are all traders the difference is how long we hold. Never a truer word said IMO

Fundamentally holding aim stocks long term is risky - so many don’t do well at all. The flip side is if you really in a company then leaving profit in is the best way to hold without worrying.

And having people on the board that can influence the defence thinking and plans of nato is bigger

It could only be better if we added the current minister of defence to the board (not that it would be allowed!).

No doubt that would still be called fluff 😂😂

Our market is our government (and others in NATO). Breaking barriers to entry via the people we add to the board is huge.

Phone!!!

Basically OMI is now half my portfolio which is silly so selling a small chunk is maybe a good idea..

I’ve finally bought but had to pay 6p.

It’s would have bought more but couldn’t sell OMI (it’s half my portfolio now sore as going to sell a small amount).

I was looking at the chart 2 weeks ago thinking it was time to buy - and it was. But there’s plenty of upside to come. This is one of those shares you have to hold.

As I said you don’t get how defence works.

This is anything but fluff.

Tesla I’m sure was ‘fluff’ one day. Difference is Tesla had to get a product that the public wanted.

We just need to get products that nato and the mod want. And part of that is relationships - or as you put it

Fluff

Sharebel hasn’t got much right about this share - I’ve made money as he or she has been telling me to sell.

And you think I should listen to sharbel?

Ummmm - no that would be stupid

I’m not sure what sharebel does for a job but I have and still do work in defence - as have and do other people that hold this share I expect.

This news is big. Huge.

Meanwhile I see sharebel banging on about money. Again fully funded till next year…

And the big boys know it which is why we have been invited to beaver creek

Legalwolf - the short answer is yes, it has to be.

High grades

Open at surface

(Therefore low AISC)

Low Capex - no plant needed

Therefore low risk

Quick turnaround from exploration to production

And we haven’t even touched papas north…

Basil - you are correct. Absolutely bang on. Connections are everything in industry.

Trying to underplay and talk down this news - means you just don’t understand how industry works.