RE: re re nugget18 Apr 2018 10:53
The only ‘facts’ on the AIM are found in RNS’s, and sometimes even those aren’t very factual. The market is waiting for an RNS that states 1/ build costs (which include ramp up) against budget 2/ quantity of gold produced during ramp up 3/ that name plate production has been achieved...... all of which the company probably knows and may well put in its quarterly RNS which is due any day. After that the market will want to know that the AISC’s are in line with budget/DFS..... not for one week or one month, but probably for a minimum of a quarter if not two..... when that has been announced in an RNS the market might be more inclined to take a risk and maybe we will see the sp rise...... but wait, the LOM is officially only 7 or so years, way too short term for an ii to dip. No amount of inferred material outside a mine plan is going to attract investment; get it drilled and into the plan and in an RNS and ‘hey presto’ the sp will change. BUT an sp of 34p and mkt cap of 100 odd mill against a budgeted annual FCF of 60/70 mill considering all the above seems cheap to me and that is why I am here. I will also echo FSJ’s point 4 from down below....... Goldfields sold the project for shares when they had higher cash offers on the table because they believed in the management and I am compelled to believe that they know a lot more about gold mining than I do (and yes, I have met Dan and Bert)