Member Info for Hydras

Duffs55, sorry but I just don't buy that reason for CH pulling out of the interview. Something else has occurred on the Enbridge contract negotiations which has changed things to the detriment of Zephyr. Not good as far as I can gather for Zephyr, as the long discussions on connection agreement go in the bin!!

Yes, manipulation of sp is happening but only the MM know how and by whom. Enbridge pals at a guess or a large spread betting outfit out to make a killing on the back of PI's. They see Zephyr as easy to manipulate, like most AIM shares in this situation.

I understand, listening to reliable reports, Colin forgot to get his teeth to the hygienist in time, so the Malcy interview had to be postponed until the correct whiteness was obtained, so he can blind us with lies, as he speaks. We all fully understand of course. Not long to wait now. Put your sunglasses on folks!!

Large buys suddenly appearing at just after 2pm. Interview must be seen as positive to those in the know!! Let's hope things are moving at long last ?? RNS tomorrow should confirm the reason for the big buys.

Disgruntled shareholders selling this morning and you can't really blame them after the last slap in the face from Will and Bo. Below the belt , not even waiting till after spudding EG, to snatch their free shares, for just doing nothing except the job they are paid to do. Daylight robbery from normal smaller shareholders.

Molatov, It is not the concern about what is in the ground, as that has been substantiated and well assessed by the independent experts. It is the difficulty and costs associated with getting the products to the market place. It seems that will not be cheap and at all easy and as yet, it has to be assisted to a great extent with a JV partner and also of course ensure commerciality, otherwise it is not worth the initial expense. Getting this result is proving extremely challenging for CH as he has shown over the last 7 months of desperately trying to get the gas to the market. Let's hope he is more successful this year than last ?? That's the big worry for investors. Getting commerciality of Paradox product is the key !!

When the big oil and gas traders are back, after their festive holidays in far flung places of the world, with their feet under their desks and have had their morning briefings, this share will certainly take off with obviously each traders having a different buy limit sp value assigned, based on their assessed risk. Presently this is a stonking buying opportunity for private investors, to get in at a very low sp. I would estimate next week it will be next stop around 5p until the well is spuded in EG and then upto 8p. Next step on success of finding the gas/oil in substantial quantities up to 15p. Definitely worth a punt with very little risk, in my view . Fill your boots investors, buy, buy, buy. DYOR. Even Less risky than Luke Littler winning the darts world championship ?

AI EOG valuation results as follows:-

If Barracuda is commercial and developed, a simple NPV model suggests Europa’s Barracuda exposure alone could support a share price in the £0.12–£0.32 range, depending on realised gas price, costs, government take, and capex.

Compare to today’s market price ~1.8–2.1 p per share, that implies a very large upside if Barracuda turns commercial and is developed into producing gas. (Note: model does not capture other assets like Inishkea or corporate value.)

📌 Important Caveats

🔹 This model is simplified and strategic — real project economics require full PSC fiscal terms, production profile, gas pricing structure, transport/take-off agreements, and timing.�

🔹 No guarantee Barracuda will be commercial — drill results could be dry or sub-commercial.

🔹 Partners’ carry repayment/priority means early cashflow to Europa may be limited until carry is repaid.�

🔹 Development capex might be higher or lower depending on infrastructure tie-in options.

📌 Conclusion

🚀 A successful Barracuda project could, in theory, underpin a share price in the tens of pence per share based on simple NPV economics.

📊 Your specific outcome depends heavily on:

Realised gas prices

PSC fiscal terms & costs

Infrastructure access and field development plan

Timing of development

When the Big Boys get back to work next week and start running their predictor AI risk/reward calculations and present them to their managers, we will see a massive correction in the EOG share price. On my very basic value calculations, with a risk of 80% success at Baracuda, EOG sp should be about 10 to 15p on EG success alone. It is so cheap and very small risk to take. Sure is worth a punt at current sp of about 2p to buy. Fill your boots !!

Great results from voting at the AGM. I Will now certainly buy more shares as I see the directors will be controlled to issue additional shares to current SH first. Which is how it should be.

There's a massive seller out there, that we haven't seen as yet in the trades, but will see later today, when enough buyers are found. After the AGM when approval is given the dilution will be applied to pay debts and fees for year end. Beware!!

Big dilution to provide EOG cash on the table, to pay for coming large costs, after the AGM. Investors are predicting this afternoon that the SH votes will now approve the AGM proposals following the massive JV RNS today. Some gamble but that's what will happen to allow things to move forward. Hold on to your seats investors. It is a bumpy ride ahead but I believe a company maker with lots to look forward to, but with some high risk attached. Worth the gamble!!

Great buying opportunity. Fill the sack Santa. Big oil involved just need it to be confirmed in the next week.

If CH was anywhere near agreeing or signing onto a JV agreement or even getting close to starting production from Paradox then the market activity would be buzzing . As it is, from looking at the market activity yesterday and today, CH is nowhere near ready to do either so forget about it being before Xmas or New Year, More like well into next year now. No surprise presents are being served up if the jungle drums are correct, and they usually are, particularly for the seminal RNS announcement expected from CH? Oh well there's always yet another year !!

Ebbs, very true, a full year knowing what Zephyr had to do to progress Paradox production, and what has CH achieved to enable production to begin? Best known to himself it seems, as he ain't told anyone else and this is critical to Zephyr making money and paying off its massive debts which still seem to be regularly increasing. Come on Colin, spill the beans on what's really happening with Paradox?

Cannot believe that any investors are actually buying these shares. Can't they understand THE PARROT IS DEAD !!

Northern, will that that be Colin's Xmas present to all his loyal shareholders? All I can say is that it had better be good after all this time in preparation after he told us there would be regular updates on progress, after the seminal findings in the CPR .

Next week is critical to the credibility of WH and his BOD's. Are they playing the shareholders or not? AGM resolutions proposed point unfortunately to the former. Will needs to show they are not playing well before the AGM !!

Setanta is right there is a big company, with lots to gain financially by holding the Zephyr sp down as low as is possible, or in other words playing with the sp until they get what they want. The only parties in this game that are losing are the Zephyr LT shareholders themselves as they can only watch until this game is played out and a compromise deal is settled and I have a definite feeling that time is not certainly not on Zephyr's side, as they keep having to borrow more and more money (at extortionate interest rates) just to keep the Paradox project progressing at a snails pace and also the company afloat. The competition of other companies interested in Paradox seems to have not materialised as CH expected.

Resolutions 7 and 8 are definitely a NO, NO as the directors can quite rapidly, without further approval from shareholders, dilute massively the share price, to pay for their wages and dividends or anything they want. Not at all good on AIM, as seen with many other small companies. It can suck out millions in cash for the benefits of the Directors and bankrupt the company. Vote against 7 and 8 if you are a shareholder and want to keep some modicum of control over what the Directors are up to.