RE: Another question4 Nov 2022 10:45
Ok so you’d name the crypto expert, leaving him/her vulnerable to being poached by other companies working in our field.
You’d name the companies involved in the NDAs, probably breaching and jeopardising those NDAs (I’ve never been involved in an NDA but I imagine that rule number one of any non-disclosure agreement, is that you don’t disclose you have an agreement together).
Thirdly, you’d name the companies doing the verifying even though it would benefit very little to shareholders other than give us the name of a company to pester when they’ll have the results.
I guess we’ll all just be happy that you’re not running the company then.