Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
"I do not think that institutional investors would buy-in for 26.5 and 26p for 40% return :D but what I know"
Very little from the sound of it. Institutions would bite your hand off, and most of your arm with it, for a 40% return. They'll very very happily buy in for a couple of percent if it's guaranteed in the short term. That's not to say the price might not be higher than that but your reasoning is nonsense.
I am my employer.
No, GAZALA69. The opening and closing auctions are the ultimate price-discovery mechanisms in the market. All market participants can take part by submitting orders and the auction price is simply the price at which the highest possible number of orders will be fulfilled. It's completely algorithmic and transparent.
And ... CODE 1? Really? I (or anyone else) could generate a CODE 1 in seconds. How is that not obvious?
BlackRock "bought in" in the sense that they run index trackers that track the MSCI index. Completely automatic, no more thought put into it than the thought you put in to breathing.
I've got a SIPP and an ISA. There's no shorting facility in either and I wouldn't use it if there were.
(The "no it's not" there was obviously directed at Folio not TMS.)
No it's not. It's all iShares, which are ETF index trackers.
None of which were in Stevo's list of stockbrokers, which is what i was responding to.
And without going through your whole list as well - you do know that the BlackRock holdings are just MSCI index trackers, right, not an active investment decision?
(former)
No, I haven't shorted EUA. I've never shorted anything. I am not philosophically opposed to shorting (it's an entirely valid part of price discovery) but I'm just a simple value investor. I could choose to go long in things I like or short in things I don't - and I just choose the latter. Sorry if that means I don't "have the fruits". Lol.
I'm right.
You know I'm right.
And you don't care.
Why?
Brilliant.
Stevo make a completely ridiculous, 100% factually incorrect post, interpreting stockbroker nominee accounts as institutional funds. This is so fundamentally wrong it completely reverses the implication of the situation - it's not that these so-called institutional investors have bought in to EUA - it's that PIs have done so. It is completely unarguable that Stevo's post is nonsense.
I call him out on it, and I'm the one who gets attacked.
It's one thing to be wrong - we all manage that from time to time. It's quite another thing to be obviously wrong and just not care, and attack anyone who dares to point it out.
Yeah this is one of the problems here.
There are some intelligent, sensible bulls who have done their research and come to a different conclusion to you and me Lucky, and that's perfectly reasonable.
But then there are hordes of sheep who don't really have a clue and think they have guaranteed "golden lottery tickets" in a fairly complex and specialist investment when they don't even know what a stockbroker is or how to perform the most basic research. And the board just gets clogged up with their aggressive nonsense spouted towards anyone who disagrees with them, because they aren't interested in logic or truth, just ultra-ramping and football-supporter-style tribalism.
Win or lose, they are gamblers, not investors - and most of them don't even realise it.
"You should start calling up A J Bell, Jarvis Securities, HSBC Global, Barclays Bank and Hargreaves Lansdown to name but a few. Tell them they have got it all wrong! Its a scam! More big guns arrive every week."
Errrrrrrr - you do realise all of those are stockbrokers holding shares in nominee accounts on behalf of their private investor clients, right?
The Zcash mining is included in the 167 - it's Bitcoin and Bitcoin equivalent, which is the term they use to cover altcoins.
So unless I'm missing something they must have bought some Bitcoin.
Yeah, he's selling the Tesla shares to buy EUA.
Actually no, scrap that, he's raising that 21 billion to put down a 10% deposit on EUA. He'll have to borrow to raise the rest. That'll be it.
"It seems that some refuse to take the jab as a show of defiance and to show whose in control."
Taking back control doesn't always have the anticipated outcome.
You didn't foresee the pandemic in September 2020? September 2020, when it had already been raging globally for ages and we'd had national and local lockdowns for months? And that's caused something that was going to happen within three months to still be dragging out over a year later?
Hi GLG! Here's a few quotes from you in September. September 2020, that is. At what point do you have to hold your hands up and accept that you're wrong?
----------------
This will be done and dusted in the 4th Quarter
----------------
It wont be several years, a few months at worst, you have to remember Dmitry starts his bit coin project in December, he cant focus on being our M&A chief and on his next project at the same time. You can tell he is extremely focused and likes to give 100% to detail, once this is wrapped up he will leave and be 100% on his next project, i expect all this done before December.
----------------
we dont know when the day is, tomorrow/friday/next week ...., but either way this will all be done and dusted in the near future
Knows what is happening, it's just a question of how long you think it is reasonable for the lawyers to do what lawyers do
It's done, they're just getting the legalities sorted out imho, the sales & purchase contract sorted out.
----------
The above was posted by mac4671 in October...
...2020.