Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Likewise.
It depends on your broker. On iweb, you can vote electronically on Corporate Actions, but this isn't classified as such.
Not seeing anything, even on the proper LSE. What and where is it?
I do agree with you, just if you are doing an analysis of ins and outs from selling assets, then you need to include the biggest asset sale.
I would be prepared to entertain an RTO offer from the right company. I wonder if the BOD can be persuaded to detail the approaches received?
There is the future value of Ruvuma to come.
If delisted, you won't see a share price rise, or be able to trade. But you should get a periodic cash return.
1.2p over time, if all the contingent payments come in.
F ing hell. Death threats. Take care Graham.
RNS - there is an attraction to a RTO, namely the BOD would not be in control.
Can the company delist to save cash, and we put in place a low cost caretaker BOD to simply file companies house returns and distribute cash received?
See pinned post top of board
I'm not normally one for advocating extra cost, but when it is a multimillion dollar a year operation, would 50k on a bit of support help? Or just get in the way and give an extra management burden? On share sales, this could be viewed as transferring wealth from the impatient to the patient.
*are (not 'care')
I'd imagine high resolution satellite images care quite large.
Guess they have been worked all day, keeping a lid on the share price?
That's true. Would a Purdah affect this, or easy for Minister Ryan to claim so?
It is possible that environment clearances for Cory Moruga in T&T, and a successor licence in Ireland, might land before the sandjet program is redesigned.
I very rarely filter, but Openheimer has joined the select list. Did the same on He1 - turned up spouting ridiculous and baseless predictions of share price doom. Adds nothing.
Last one - promise. A friend of a friend had an issue with her Audi A3. Dealership said requires a new engine. She was very surprised as it only had 140k on the clock, and was even more surprised to be told that was the design life of the new 1.4TFSI engine. Compare that to my father's 1.6 that is still going strong on 170k. I wonder what the design life of the 1.0 turbos is? I imagine a lot of the newer smaller engines fitted to bigger cars are going to go bang even sooner, as they are lugging more weight around. The attitude seems to be it doesn't matter how it works in the real world, as long as the numbers look good when new.
Just to continue the 'new car winge', I got a call from my sister, whose car had gone flat at the airport. I talked her through how to bump start it, and she said she couldn't as the electronic handbrake couldn't be released without power. I also recently had my garage asking how I had driven my car there with a failed brake pipe. I explained by use of gear changes and the handbrake, and they pointed out you can't do that either with an electronic one (or presumably an auto, which all of the EVs seem to be).
The steering on the hire car was most disconcerting, as it seemed to try to prevent me changing lanes on the autoroute. We figured out that if you didn't indicate it thought you had drifted off. The same applied to straight lining corners. It also put the brakes on when overtaking a lorry as it didn't like me approaching with a speed advantage. It also tried to predict speed limits and would apply the brakes. I have the impression that a lot of the technology fitted to newer cars today under the banner of safety unnecessarily jacks up the price for the benefit of the manufacturers while deskilling drivers. Will this actually put folk off buying newer cleaner cars?