gilteddge5 Aug 2010 14:36
looks like we are going to see this report in two different lights......
improving yield and vacancy rates do not overcome a drop in property value:
Performance
Over the year the portfolio performance, on a like for like basis, showed
declines of 1.6 per cent. for the UK and 8.5 per cent. (in Euros) in Europe
(2009: -35.4 per cent. and -18.1 per cent. respectively). The aggregate
portfolio valuation was £238.7m at the year end, an overall decline on a like
for like basis of 7.9 per cent. (2009: -26.7 per cent.).
The UK portfolio delivered positive capital performance for each of the last
three quarters of the year. In Europe the Company's property values have
continued to fall but the last three quarters have shown the lowest rates of
decline experienced since their valuation peaked in June 2007.
At the year end the Company's NAV per share (IFRS basis) stood at -19.9p per
share (2009: -13.8p) and the adjusted NAV was -4.7p per share (2009: 1.6p).
Income generation has remained robust. Revenue earnings per share were 5.8p per
share (2009: 3.7p). This is a pleasing result and reflects asset management
efforts to retain and increase rental income as well as continued diligence in
controlling costs.
So yes in some respects things are improving but the property valuations in europe have not levelled out, yet. I would like nothing more than for them to turn it around as i hold them and have done for 17 months. Whatever way you look at it a NAV of -4.7p is not good. At least they are improving the debt situation, they have just offloaded another property today. But without extra funding how can they benefit from any future upturn?