Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Flowkey.
I am pleased that you have challenged this person. There are several people like him on LSE and I have challenged some of them. It is actually an offence to act in this way.
Mr Truell holds a 25% stake in Sabien via the pension super fund and it appears to me that this stake has simply been transferred from one interest to another.
The pension super fund seems stable and progressive and gives me some confidence that we are in safe hands.
The news of a high profile director being recruited and some expansion will be welcome.
I invested in this company as I believed in green energy and the potential of our product.
As I am invested and do not want to exit at a loss I obviously want this company to be a success. With funding in place I expect the board to stay, look to expand in this country and make this company a success.
Today’s share price looks like a good opportunity for many and if it was the first time I was looking at this share today I would invest in it.
This is absolutely shocking. After one full year a 50% loss. You can also add to that the opportunities lost without having access to that working capital.
The boiler business does not appear to have moved forward in the last year. Do we have any confidence therefore in this company getting our share value back.
The answers provided have offered me reassurance. The previous lack of information had left me feeling uncertain and anxious about my investment. As this information is there for all to see I now trust the board to do their best to complete this deal.
I was attracted by the product innovation and the investing of Mr Diggle. The lack of any news does seem odd for a listed company but whilst the share price remains relatively stable I will hold and wait for that RNS.
In reply to one of my earlier posts I was told that Mr Parris is easy to contact. He would be the person I would contact. I am resigned to voting on the 20/1 and the regulators should do their duty and make sure that any process is completed correctly.
I am not sure how difficult the process from delist to return is but I would assume that the people in charge will know, that the process is straightforward and that is why they have been prepared to fail to complete the deal on time.
If the return is not planned what benefit will this be to the people in charge.
I was relieved that an AGM will now take place and that following the AGM that the process back to the stock market will start. I hope that this is a straightforward process and put trust in what was said in the RNS.
I am now concerned however by the message of Anthony James. How does he have contact with Mr Parris and why have other posters messages disappeared today? What are the regulators not happy with and why must we now act quickly after waiting for nearly 12 months?