Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
And yes, this is a misleading title. A lot of people keep posting vague websites about how bears are in control or that Trevor is selling.
Breaking news: HE ISN'T. And he doesn't have plans to in the near future. This cloud will clear up and value will return.
Keep in mind:
1) Carl mentioned Paraytec is full throttle on this test. News will come when news is due. This test is like a PCR-test with a speed faster then LFT's. This will make most PCR-testing labs obsolete.
2) They are looking for manufacture / license partners to bring the test to market. IF this goes as planned, a 19m company will be worth multiples of that.
Are you really believing BoJo that COVID is gone?
Lockdowns will be out, not COVID.
https://mobile.twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1391858490696732678
the India #B1617 variant is also growing fast in the UK. Extremely fast.
We should let science speaks for itself. To show what the potential is, first we need to measure up the current landsape. Up to now, the approach of the governments are:
1) PCR - for greater accuracy
2) LFT - for low cost, mass testing.
The advantages and disadvantages
PCR:
- Greater accuracy, able to detect low amount of viruses.
- (Depending on how you define): false positive results (https://medical.mit.edu/covid-19-updates/2020/11/pcr-test-result)
LFT:
- low detection limits, serological test and thus faster / easier to perform then PCR. Main advantage is that bacause of their lower detectionlimit, they detect more of the infectious people (and not all who are or has been infected in the past).
- Clear negative is: YOU ARE AT RISK OF FALSE NEGATIVES and thus this can never be a green-light test and that is why f.e. on entry of the UK you are still required to take a PCR test for variants
I am just going to quote Carl Smythe on this and take a look at what he's posting as a SCIENTIST: https://twitter.com/carlsmythe/status/1384522354785726471
"Here’s the thing.
1.Lateral flow tests are not terribly sensitive
2. AVCT selected clinical samples with relatively high viral loads and find their test can identify most of them.
3. Going forward, we need to be able to screen people to find asymptomatics."
We are now entering a world in which a lot of people will be vaccinated. No surprise, a vaccine is NOT a silver bullet, people will be infected but it will be more or less like the flu or a cold. (I know people who tested pos. despite being vaccinated).
Simple logic: vaccine -> more protection -> less viral loads so MORE SENSITIVE TESTING IS NEEDED. Meanwhile, more and more people will have had covid at some point so PCR-test will produce a ton of false positives.
And then comes the absolute beauty, the Paraytec-developed technology.
They have a test that has a PCR-like detectionlimit, while it is (I think) more of a serological test and easy to perform (2minutes). And that is not all. They have developed a way to detect VIRAL corona, as in infectious samples that will cultivate virus and eventually spread:
https://twitter.com/carlsmythe/status/1385010565777608708
" Here is a single virus coated with a fluorescent antibody which specifically recognises the viral corona."
TLDR, brief summary:
The Paraytec test has the potential to combine the positive elements of LFT's and PCR's while eliminating the negative elements:
1) It is designed as simple to use, no specialist knowledge needed;
2) It is FAST, 2 minutes.
3) It is ON THE SPOT, no lab needed
4) It detects up to CT37; WHILE
5) And this is the absolute beauty: only giving positive results on people that are PRE-SYMPTOMATIC.
https://twitter.com/carlsmythe/status/1390284340748328961
I am absolutely confident about #BRH believing in what is being done. a
I cannot comment on the decisions of individuals.
I don’t think it’s productive to
https://mobile.twitter.com/carlsmythe/status/1390207003524542467
Because it works. Works well. And exceeds expectations.
^
And all that for a 17m market-cap company. Over 33% of the current outstanding shares switched hands just above this price which provides a bottom
https://twitter.com/carlsmythe/status/1390202246370107401
Ask him about the science
This was posted this morning on twitter
https://twitter.com/Timtimtimtim15/status/1363749270181064704
I remember reading the contract back in september and it stating that new tech could be bought under the same contract and not needing approval for another.
Could this mean that we are waiting for an RNS that isn't going to land anyways because it isn't "material" enough or that they can't say wether it will be worthy of an RNS due to NDA?
Hi
Just wondering to place this in perspective.
Does your hospital has capabality's to do PCR-testing such as a lab in-house (or nearby)?
I believe that back in september one of the locations discussed for the Q16 and Q32's are the hospitals that didn't have testing capabilities and (the bigger) carehomes.
You are closer to the horse's mouth than the most of us here.