RE: Ratherbrown3x and 2x28 Jul 2019 10:08
Try reading the posts: both RBD and UOG say that the partnership is planning the optimum way forward. It was always intended that the Colter well would be plugged and abandoned: that was a term of the PP. The intention was always that any exploitation would be from onshore using long-reach drilling.
My view is that the two drills and the two new licences change things slightly. One comment was that 30% of Colter was in the offshore block to the South, which they now hold.
Again, my view, not a fact, is that the data from the drills makes them think that the Purbright prospect is a goer. Purbright is part onshore and part offshore: it can be drilled from onshore and do is easier, cheaper and quicker.
What they will be doing now is rerunning the seismic data, recalibrating it using the hard data from the drill results. This should give a clearer view of the Colter structure and a more accurate volumetric calculation.
DYOR