Member Info for Helpful

If you look at the two PQE RNSs you will see that PQE originally quoted 200 bopd on a 12 hour shift pattern and now they say it is 200 bopd on an 8 hour shift pattern. They have also put a qualifier in on one of their statements.

How is that AOGL's fault? If PQE puts out an RNS, AOGL should acknowledge it.

and "believes is the first"

It seems the change is quoting an 8 hour shift rather than 12 hour shift/

That makes production about 25 barrels an hour, when producing. So 24/7 is 600bopd: about what we are expecting once fully sorted.

PS

the last thing that PQE needs is a leak. They will be checking all moving parts for signs of a possible leak, for signs of abrasion, testing for excessive vibration, signs of clogging etc. This, in effect, is a new plant: they have to check and double-check that everything is operating within acceptable parameters.

To check parts of the plant, they will have clean it, disassemble it and reassemble it.

DYOR

I don't know but I suspect that the use of the word sustained is a bit moot. Does sustained mean 24/7 or is running it for 18 hours and then taking it off line to check things sustained or is running it on 12 hour shifts for three days and then taking it offline to check things sustained.

Sustained doesn't mean continuous.

DYOR

*that should read BP rather than Shell.

Well, next up should be news on licensing deals with third parties. As I said a while back but the highly informed, extremely well-researched investment gurus on here pooh-poohed it, I can see five producing plants by end of December 2020. It could possibly be six.

I still don't think that they will be producing flat out 24/7 just yet. I think that they will be calling a halt every few days to inspect the internals of the plant to see if they are getting any clogging issues with clay fines. As those inspections give a clean bill of health the gap between inspections will get longer.

PS for the people who don't know, I used to run chemical plants with Shell a long while back. I have actually done the type of start ups and shut downs that they will be doing. It will be safety first and then making sure that they know how to control the plant. They will be documenting everything so that it informs how they design, build and operate the subsequent plants.

PPS there is a very small, outside chance that someone like BP might fancy holding a chunk of PQE. Shell rather than BP because Shell sees natural gas as the way forward.

DYOR

Sinbad, this is why I have said multiple times that the fantasies that CW is in place because I want him to be in place are just that, fantasies.

CW will remain in place until such time as the former Attis shareholders change their minds. At the moment TB wants CW to be CEO, which is why he is CEO.

If TB wants him to be CEO, do you not think he might have a very good reason?

All this personal animosity has been generated by our little friend for reasons nothing to do with Attis/Mayan. You have all been manipulated.

Stalin lets not have you put so much effort into trying to be funny: you might upset Sinbad, who obviously thinks he is the resident comedian.

Well been very busy with stuff today but whilst waiting for a document to print off I spoke to CW and read him some of your posts. We both had a good laugh. You have now got to the stage that you are a comedy routine.

He wants to know, what makes you think he has two appendages?

PS what is with all this alluding to other people being gay? Have you got some sort of issue about it?

xx

https://twitter.com/AndalasEnergy/status/1185112746175668225?s=19

https://twitter.com/zenithenergyltd/status/1185124672494546944?s=19

As usual Mr Boo you have it wrong. 1. You don't have sight of the paperwork and 2. you don't know what the plan is.

I negotiated the terms and am more than happy with them.

xx

https://twitter.com/speculate247/status/1184471672134483970?s=19

http://pdf.reuters.com/htmlnews/htmlnews.asp?i=43059c3bf0e37541&u=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20191018:nRSR2959Qa

Well hopefully, they confirm volume sustained production today: the wait seems to be driving some people crazy.

Just watched it from another source.....

Excellent!

I will leave all the trolls to hang their heads in shame.

Well there you go. The plan was to sell as soon as the shares were swapped out of Deloro but the registration process was delayed, partly the fault of your favourite CEO but mainly the fault of PQE. You wouldn't believe the number of times we discussed should we have sold at US$.90 instead of being greedy. I very nearly sold again at CAN$60 but was in a meeting.

However, with all of these things it is where we are now that matters. And I have warrants.

DYOR

Sinbad, you need to calm down, you will do yourself a mischief.

If you are going to hold yourself out as a investment guru who knows the answer to everything it would be an idea to read an RNS or two.

PQE a few months back issued an RNS that it had done a deal with Valkor

The December 2020 plant is a new plant separate from PQE's plant and not owned by PQE.

https://petroteq.energy/news/press-releases/detail/319/petroteq-announces-technology-licensing-agreement

As to multiple deals..

https://petroteq.energy/news/press-releases/detail/324/petroteq-achieves-milestones-in-emerging-international

QEM
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20190717/pdf/446nvvtvz2tdj2.pdf
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20191015/pdf/449hxjqw8jjcxf.pdf

Don't listen to anything I have to say. Read the attached documents and make your own mind up.

I will be speaking to QEM in a few weeks. I suspect that there will be a nice deal to be done there in due course.

Of course, our little friend is no longer being paid to provide "research" on PQE and so he now takes a different view. http://www.alignresearch.co.uk/cpt-company/petroteq-energy-inc/

DYOR

Hey, best you stick to PFP. Looks like you have been getting serious grief over there.

PS based on your own posting over there you should lodged a TR1 when you went below 9%. Very naughty old boy.