RE: "filibuster"of a RNS15 Dec 2020 11:27
Under the hedge there is no need to produce. If the market price is below the hedge price, the hedge vendor (Barclays) simply sells us the difference. So if the hedge price was $55 and the market price was $30, they send us $25 for every barrel hedged. If we produced those barrels and the opex was $20 then we would be getting $10 barrel from production. If we don't produce those barrels and instead sell them for $45 a barrel at a later date then we get $25 a barrel net.
It costs money to create reserves, no point selling them unless you have to in a weak price environment. The company was cute in shutting in production. Remember he also put extra storage in place so that he would have flexibility on sales.
When all the trolls on here and on Twitter were going on about only 60 bopd being pathetic, that 60 was a result of shut ins. Those wells will have recharged whilst shut in and should produce at a better rate when initially switched back on.
Costs are way down in the current environment. I know from elsewhere that labour, kit hire and materials are way cheaper than they were a year ago.
I suspect that once the new Pine Mills well is online, NTOG will be properly cashflow positive. Once they sort themselves out on the new Permian Basin asset, NTOG should look pretty good. He did say in an interview a few weeks back that the Permian Basin work would be done during December.
DYOR