RE: Copper11 Mar 2025 13:58
Boring Boy, you are such a bag of fun...
Regardless of how the market values the assets stolen from RRR now; $420mil was paid for them then.
Any claim against the party or parties involved with the theft will deal with consequential loss. The price of copper is material in the calculations for consequential loss.
The same would apply to any company in a similar situation to RRR. If the price of copper is materially higher than so is the consequential loss claim.
For someone who reckons he understands economics, accounting and investment it is a bit strange that you continue to deny basic fundamentals just because RRR is involved.
And yes before you start prattling on about how any settlement is likely to be lower than any claim: really? That is the high point of your input? Look at Ascent Resources, they have a claim against the Slovenian Government in the ICSID (the next hearing is due soon). As the price of Natural Gas in Central Europe has gone up, so has the quantum of the Ascent claim. Same applies here.
The lowest RRR's claim can be is $200m plus interest plus costs. I have posted detailed accounts of what needs to be done but that is the low point of any claim. The actual claim is likely to be materially higher. The monetary value of 400,000 tonnes of copper alone is about $3.8bn at current prices plus the other interval at depth (being exploited at KOV) plus the cobalt plus the other two licences. Yes, I know about costs, royalties, corporation tax, interest on funding etc and discounting for an NPV (rather better than you do, I suspect). But key is the copper price.
DYOR FW zzzzzzz