Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
CatSteffan is of course absolutely correct in what he says.
has nailed it. For the second time in just a couple of months, Sando is using the same tactic to quite literally stack the deck against PIs.
The belated AGM will of course contain resolutions to allow him to issue God knows how much more confetti (solely to enable the company to meet existing incurred financial liabilities in ever more worthless paper). He obviously realises that he needs a self-controlled bloc of 10% of votes to get these resolutions over the line and keep his personal gravy train running just that little bit longer.
Needless to say it is bitterly amusing that at no point in its history has UKOG ever given a rat's ass about its Employee Benefit Trust, until Sando started to get nervous about not being able to scrape up the support he needed on votes.
I suppose I could find a grudging admiration for a really cleverly executed scam... but this is just the most blatant rigging possible.
Whispering states "Are you really sure you want to hear (?) given your recent prolific postings, are you really open to the opinions of others, do you really want a balanced perspective?"
For the record and having long been a fan of devil's advocacy as a significantly enlightening tool, my POV is that opinions of others - and especially counter-opinions - are potentially the most useful opinions of all...
...BUT ONLY if backed up by a) reason and b) evidential justification. Otherwise they're just facile contradictory noise and don't represent "balance" in even the slightest way.
Whispering then goes on to say "Then you can be full of your own convictions to your hearts content … perhaps it’s exactly what you aim to achieve?"
Two words. Pot... kettle.
Geez... does anyone give a rat's behind about what ANGS may burble on about on Twitter?
A question that is perhaps a teensy bit more relevant would be:-
"Will the ANGS BoD manage for once to do something... anything... that stops the ANGS SP from endlessly circling the drain?"
The Ocebot's clearly running out of material in his/her/its ongoing attempts to polish the unpolishable and is having to resort to copy n pasting previous pompom waving (which did nothing first time round, either).
The company had better remobilise the Ocebot as soon as possible, with his/her/its ramptastic nonsense.
Not that this would make a blind bit of difference at this advanced stage. The cold, hard crashing waves of reality can only be held back for so long...
It's also significant that Amit posted (then very rapidly deleted) the details of the Chicago bank that was allegedly holding funds.
"At times"?
Part of the latest in an apparently endless series of updates is indeed believable. Amit seems to have forgotten (or never bothered) to log who he was flogging shares to post the company's delist.
That would certainly be in character.
Nope, it's 10 day old news and the same lot - or else a further RNS would have needed to be issued.
Mr Herbert's recent £25k purchase is currently worth less than £19k. Mind you, that's a lot smaller than longer-term PIs' losses.
The failed attempt to use "misogynistic" as an insult did amuse me. I guess he/she/they/xe objected to having the ginger ringlets of Lil Orphan Annie called into play again.
Nothing even faintly misogynistic about that. In the eponymous musical, I think I can safely surmise that the composer intended that the lead should be seen as what I believe might these days be called a cissexual female? Anyhow, gender is irrelevant in the comparison between Whispering's and Annie's world views - as anyone with an IQ larger than their shoesize would instantly have grasped, the relevance is instead all about hope without foundation.
"Tomorrow, tomorrow
I love ya tomorrow
You're always, a day away
Tomorrow, tomorrow
I love ya tomorrow
You're always, a day away."
Whispering, the inalienable fact remains that literally the only foundation for your particular point of view is "Because Amit keeps saying so".
So you and your ginger ringlets are solely relying upon statements from someone who to date has not uttered a truthful word - but plenty of mendacious ones.
This is simply bound to result in the justification underlying your strenuous pompom exertions being called into doubt, no?
"The agents now have monies".
Presenting that statement as if it were a categoric fact is bizarre, given that the sole source of that information has repeatedly and undeviatingly demonstrated itself not to even have an imperceptibly nodding acquaintance with any form of truth.
Literally the only justification underpinning the ginger-ringleted pompom wavers (you know who you are) remains "Because Amit said so". Just a tad of a flimsy foundation, I'd say.
I'm afraid so. PIs' investments are Down The Dustpipe, after having fully financed Scamderson to be able to be Living On An Island.
As for PIs being able to join Salmon Slacks, all he's paid out for is tickets on a Paper Plane.
Hans Christian "1.5p minimum by end of March 2024" Andersen is back, I see.
Ocelot is really having to reach into more ridiculous realms than usual in his/her ongoing efforts to polish the unpolishable.
I wonder what he/she gets paid, given that his/her posts do precisely - and unsurprisingly - nothing to stop the cold, harsh tides of reality crashing into this ever more fragile collection of farcical fairytales.
With Amit's record of spotless trustworthiness and truthfulness, I wouldn't be surprised if since delist, he's been selling people shares without logging those sales in the register book.
Https://theesk.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/kicking-can.jpg
Whispering, you're neither challenging anything, nor are you particularly challenging in any way.
All you've done (in the two months since you first registered on LSE) is continue to burble that it all might well come good in the end - much like a talent-free orphan Annie in some dire SEN primary school production tunelessly belting out the "Tomorrow" song at the top of her atonal little lungs.
Much like Amit himself, you entirely rely upon the cold hard logical fact that it is impossible to categorically prove a negative, no matter how much the huge weight of evidence clearly indicating said negative.
On that basis, I expect you'll carry on pom-pom waving for Amit for the foreseeable. Tiresome? Yes. Trite? Certainly. But challenging? Hardly.
Talking rubbish, am I? Making something up, possibly? Nope... that's what you do, Onetomany.
This is pathetically easy to prove - here's a post you made on he 5th of January this year, copied verbatim. It's freely available to view in your post history:-
************
Onetomany Premium Member
Posted in: ANGS
Posts: 253
Price: 0.50
No Opinion
RE: Positive indicators 5 Jan 2024 14:35
Barney I think once funding terms are clarified and signed then that in itself will have a major boost. Gas I’m expecting to reach 120+ over the coming cold months and a storage partner update also due within Q1.
Take a look at the CPR and the many references to it by the BoD. End of March I expect 1.5p of not more. It’s all upside from here but still some variables.
************
Oops. Sure, there's a fairytale spinner here... but it very provably isn't me.
How does Onetomany get his buying insights?
Simple - he just makes stuff up in the hope that suckers will fall for it so he can trade more easily. Remember, this is the guy who assured everyone less than 4 months ago that the SP would be 1.5p at a minimum (!!!) by the end of March this year...