George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
There was a poster on another company's BB last year who would constantly mention MATD in his posts, regardless of the topic. When their predictions about that company did not come to fruition they disappeared. Can't help but think this is their new Alias.
Well my trade at 08:42 for 2,250,000 is showing as a Sell when it was in fact a buy. End of the day the daily movements wont amount to much until we get some actual news.
I guess Trade March contact was wrong unless a mid day RNS comes out. A good lesson why you should always keep quiet in case you are wrong (and your not breaching FCA regulations!)
Ive seen cash shells around the £3m mcap mark a few times. But dreaming of 15-20p at this moment is cookoo land.
But if they do have another company lined up, why unsuspend trading of the shares? That doesn't make sense IMO.
I agree its not a good look for the company, but when we are so far down I expect a lot of these individuals don't care how it makes the company look due to the severe lack of progress and therefore how the SP has fared. Any posts now by the company direct usually have the comments functioned turned off now as they know they will get a lot of abuse as things stand.
Firstly a lot of holders including myself did not believe this individual worked for the company. Especially when it changed from worked for SYME to being a contractor. 2 very different things. Secondly completed guesswork that he was formally this "Sage" individual and either way it does matter as we all wlays say nothing that is said here has any impact on the SP so making these accusations is pointless.
I remember that AGM well Lex and I actually questioned AZ directly regarding this. Had absolutely nothing to do with him not controlling the voting the rights but rather he wanted to see how the rest of the shareholders voted so only case part of his holdings. If you think about it, if he just cast the full lot in one hit then all shareholders would have known that if they opposed any of the resolutions it would be pointless voting and therefore discouraged voting. At least by partial votes it actually gave others a change to seriously oppose any resolutions - which we did not. I said this at the time you and your ilk were highlighting this. If you actually cared to know the answer, you would have made an effort to find out like I did. But surprise surprise you did not and with complete and utter bias you assumed it was for a negative reason, which as I above there was a clear logical explanation . Whether you believe what AZ told me is the truth or not is down to you.
NS20 - the last agm confirmed to me that it was definitely option 2 which comforted me. However! I was not happy that they clearly knew of issues and this was never elaborated on until that agm when they got asked questions directly. So they do need to communicate better with delays.
Hi rocky i would disagree about the rampers being more damaging than the detractors, if anything they are both just as bad. Your comment "I was drawn into the unicorns and rainbows statements early on" makes it sound like you bought in based upon the comments of this bb and are blaming them for your loss.. You should know that no one should ever buy in based on comments on a BB and only via direct comms from the company. Thats why i bought in. Therefore the only people to blame for losses is the company, or yourself (if you sell out at a loss when if you held on you could have made a profit).