Member Info for H2hooo

Https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bs-holdings-ltd_loi-fuel-supply-announcement-ugcPost-7346440462339063809-DTh3/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAADhUahcBbnR9XJmMc4jpK1OZMt1lomXd5wg

Https://www.linked in.com/posts/brian-hood-294009126_amanda-lyne-we-discussed-hydrogen-vehicles-activity-7353832556179398663-YmpJ/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAADhUahcBbnR9XJmMc4jpK1OZMt1lomXd5wg (remove the space between linked and in)

Whining into your PC and had my post removed? After what you have always claimed, lol, from this pint on you are now ‘Hypocrite’

Oh Red, don’t worry your little bully m8 was calling out for you earlier. What a complete pair of muppets you are together, wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the same account as well. Loser.

Ladies, gentlemen and rampers of all denominations, it's time to dust off your dabbers and play the only game more repetitive than Testpack3’s posts: Testpack Bingo.

Grab your card and watch for these classics:

“Paid Uber Ramper” ✅

“The Fraud Bob” ✅

“Jam Tomorrow” ✅

“I know more about gasification than anyone!” ✅

“Admitted he sold!” (scandal!) ✅

“Fake PhD” ❌ (real one, sorry mate – you lost that round in 2019)

“Brazil” 🌴

“Deflection!” 🔁

“My sources (totally real, honest)” 🕵️

“Why didn’t you answer me last week at 3:42am!?” 😱

“RNS Conspiracy!” 🧙‍♂️

“I’ve filtered you, but here’s 500 words analysing your haircut” ✍️

“I know more than you because... reasons” 🤷

First to a full house wins a copy of "How to Lose Friends and Alienate Investors" – Testpack’s upcoming memoir.

Oh dear, Testpack, I see your green filter has betrayed you again – still can’t resist reading every word I write, even while pretending not to. Freud would have a field day.

Your obsession with "Uber rampers", "frauds", and fictional payrolls is becoming less like debate and more like a Dan Brown novel written during a nervous breakdown.

As for your never-ending chorus about my PhD – yes, that old chestnut – let’s be very clear (to borrow your favourite phrase): awarded in 2019, under Dr Frank Curry. Happy to send you a signed copy of the thesis, though I doubt it's as imaginative as the screenplay you're writing here.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I must dash – Paul’s just sent me my latest ramping instructions in invisible ink, and Ohdearswaz and I have a Zoom with Elvis and the moon landing crew to plan our next ‘deflection’. But before I go:

Testpack, I have you filtered – not because I’m afraid, but because reading your posts feels like listening to a dial-up modem scream obscenities.

But don’t worry – we’ll still keep the bingo cards warm for you. One day you’ll win. Just not the argument.

Ah, now we’ve pivoted from the original thesis—"Powerhouse doesn’t have a product"—to something altogether more slippery: “well yes, they have a prototype, but it’s toy-sized and no one will pay to make it real.” A classic move—when the facts don’t go your way, just shift the goalposts and act like you were there all along.

Let’s address the first howler: the suggestion that because someone—somewhere—once got a SAF grant for £4.4 million, this proves Powerhouse has failed. That’s like arguing your neighbour’s lottery win means you’re terrible with money. You’ve dragged in Abundia and Teesside as if that single data point, from a specific SAF competition with narrow parameters, somehow invalidates every step Powerhouse has taken. It doesn't. They weren’t even in that race at the time. But do carry on pretending they were out-run in a contest they didn’t enter—it’s good theatre.

Next, your attempt to paint the FTU as some kind of embarrassing science fair project is delightfully disingenuous. That “toy” has a functioning thermal loop, handles real mixed plastic waste, produces high-purity syngas, and has already attracted commercial interest. It’s modular because that’s the point—you build small, scalable units instead of lumbering white elephants. That’s called engineering for deployment, not fantasy for forums.

As for the flaring of syngas, you continue to peddle this tired idea that the absence of hydrogen bottling on day one is some devastating own goal. It’s a prototype test unit. Not a revenue generator. You don’t bolt on purification and compression hardware until you’ve validated your upstream gas stream. Which, inconveniently for your narrative, they now have. The off-take kit is coming, and not because someone mislaid the company credit card—it’s because that’s how development cycles work. You wouldn’t expect a concept car to have heated seats and a cup holder before it’s passed a crash test. But here we are, throwing stones from the kerb.

And finally, I do enjoy the implication that this reply is somehow the work of an AI—your not-so-subtle attempt to undermine the response by imagining it was stitched together by a robot with no skin in the game. Sorry to disappoint you, but this was written by actual flesh and blood. No algorithms, no prompts—just the irritating clarity of someone who knows what they’re talking about. I get it though: when logic is against you, it must be easier to believe the opposition is synthetic. That way, you don’t have to actually keep up.

But if you’d prefer your debates conducted in crayon or semaphore, I can try to slow it down. Just say the word.

Ah yes, the Pellet Paradox. Because Powerhouse once used plastic pellets in a tidy investor demonstration, this now apparently rewrites the entire operational DNA of the DMG system? Fascinating. By that logic, if NASA demonstrated a rocket launch with a balloon and a straw, we should cancel SpaceX and fund Hobbycraft...... Ah, thank you for that latest dispatch from the Ministry of the Blindingly Obvious. Yes, the 2.5-tonne Feedstock Testing Unit isn’t a commercial product. That’s because it’s a testing unit. It’s not a commercial reactor, it’s a scientific and engineering platform designed to prove the system works, refine the thermal loop, validate the syngas yield, and optimise control systems. In other words, it’s doing precisely what it was built to do.

Declaring “the numbers don’t work on paying the capex” for a 2.5-tonne FTU is akin to saying you wouldn’t pay off a Ferrari with a child’s pedal car. No one is trying to. The FTU exists to simulate and model the full-scale unit’s performance in miniature, not to recoup investment. It’s like mocking a wind tunnel for not generating revenue.

As for the flaring of syngas—yes, they chose not to buy the offtake kit. Not because they forgot their wallet, but because there’s no point capturing gas you don’t intend to monetise at this stage. The system was designed to test throughput, feedstock conversion, and system control—not to start pumping hydrogen into a pipeline before the ink is even dry on certification.

And your mental image of the embarrassed Powerhouse engineer being caught without a syngas storage tank by a visiting dignitary is, frankly, fantasy. Anyone serious enough to be invited to Bridgend knows what a prototype is, and why some components are fitted later—or specced differently depending on the partner’s goals. If anything, the fact that the system runs cleanly and consistently enough to need that offtake kit is the entire point.

And now, the grand flourish—“they’re still in early development.” Thank you for that breaking news. Yes, they are. Powerhouse is not operating a nationwide fleet of hydrogen reactors yet. They’re finishing the final mile of an R&D journey that includes: Independent feasibility approval from DNV, Thermal and gas flow stability in live operation, Active commercial conversations for scale-up plants.

All this, while most so-called competitors are still waving whitepapers and digital twins like magic wands.

So let’s not confuse a deliberate, engineered demonstration system with failure. The unit was never built to be a commercial product—it was built to make one. And judging by the growing queue of partners circling, it’s doing that rather well.

If you still think the absence of a syngas storage tank in a prototype means the tech is doomed, you might want to sit this one out. Engineering’s happening—whether or not your imagination is.

From their 2023 Bridgend “Feedstock Testing Unit” investor presentation (cited in a March 2025 Longspur report), it states the FTU “processes a mixed plastic waste stream (non‑recyclable waste from a UK recycling facility)” to generate syngas

powerhouseenergy.co.uk

researchlongspur.com

otcmarkets.com

And on their own tech overview (via Altec Energy, their DMG® tech partner), it reads:

“…the process can deal with unrecyclable, mixed, sorted and contaminated plastics”

altec-energy.com

wp-powerhouse-2023.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com

So yes—Powerhouse does not painstakingly sort each polymer upright. They take a mixed, non-recyclable plastic mess and turn it into syngas—with minimal pre-sorting beyond removing recyclables like metals or glass. I do know this - right?

Now, for the record—and let’s not let facts get in the way of a good bin fire—£25 million was indeed handed out. But not for tipping Tesco carrier bags full of last Tuesday’s curry into jet engines. The headline grabber was LanzaTech, who pocketed a cool £25 million for their DRAGON project in Port Talbot. But instead of using rotting nappies and crisp packets, they’re turning industrial waste gases from steelworks into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). That’s right—steel mill burps, not landfill belches.

But here’s where our tale of mistaken rubbish identity finds a sliver of truth. Other companies—Velocys, Fulcrum BioEnergy, and Alfanar—are working on using processed black-bag-type waste (specifically Refuse-Derived Fuel or RDF) to make SAF. The key word here is processed. As in: filtered, shredded, sorted, and sanitised beyond recognition. It’s the waste equivalent of putting a tracksuit on and pretending you’re going to the gym.

So no, no one’s been given a blank cheque to fly EasyJet on the fumes of last year’s leftover turkey. But yes, some genuinely interesting, waste-to-jet-fuel projects are being quietly funded under the Advanced Fuels Fund. And quite rightly—this is the kind of circular economy theatre that might just get us through the 21st century without roasting ourselves.

PHE is not running a plastic sorting dojo. They’re not out there lovingly handpicking yoghurt pots from crisp packets or alphabetising polymers by chemical mood swings. No, what they’re actually doing is far more interesting—and far messier. They take non-recyclable, mixed plastic waste—the stuff even the recycling elves won’t touch—and shove it into the DMG setup. It’s a beautiful bit of thermochemical sorcery that breaks the material down into syngas - but you knew that eh?

Alexandra is making some comments this morning in the group. ht tps://t. me/+PJ BnYTx R-NQ wN2Rk

(Remove the spaces to get the link) Feel free to join if it helps.

It's more than all he ever added was that Howard is selling, repeatedly and I mean repeatedly. I took time to go to the AGM and wrote a reflective report and despite this, Castle then sells up and calls everyone liars in the company. TBH, I took the decision myself as he's not adding anything, just trading and using and I just don't get what he thinks he's achieving. Undoubtedly, I'm sure I too will now be one of his 'clown faces', ah well, too bad.

Https://wp-powerhouse-2023.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/media/2023/04/970-GR-004-Rev-1-DNV-Technology-Threat-Assesement.pdf

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/PHE/completion-of-feed-for-nh2-i8e956j10k4su8v.html

powerhouse’s dmg® technology shows very strong potential for integration into the patented avioxx saf platform. we were particularly impressed by the engineering rigour and control infrastructure, and we’re now commencing an rdf-to-syngas testing programme with the team.

https://www.lin kedin.co m/posts/chris-han****-2a2a713_southwales-saf-circulareconomy-activity-7343590815367147522-97wn/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=acoaaakyjq0b7bmmkoln8xd8s2hlk9vizwe-zfc

Https://ohridorganics.com/news/ohrid-organics-trading-update/

Lol, no reply because i have him on filter, it's pretty simple.

thanks for resharing dusty, i have had tp3 on filter for over a year now, but i see his nasty little accusations are still rampant. sorry chuck, theone is not me i'm afraid. and i won't be unfiltering him anytime soon as trying to debate with this guy is like the proverbial trying to play chess with a pidgeon. no matter what what move you make, he just struts all over the board, ****ting all over the place thinking he's won. well, life it far too short to get wound up by ******s like him, he's far too hard of thinking and completely graceless.

Https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1071694/powerhouse-energy-reports-strong-start-to-the-year-for-engsolve-business-1071694.html

· FEED for National Hydrogen, which commenced in January and is due to be completed at the end of May 2025

· Owners Engineer Support for Wastefuel of America on a large-scale Bio-Methanol facility

· Design and build of a first of a kind Aluminium Recycling process (confidential client)

· Further support to TrimTabs for the development of their novel Carbon Nano tube process

£1m revenue in first 4 months of this year - great RNS I think.

Has this now changed to a crossramping board?