Member Info for GrumpyScouser

@seahawk : almost right.

But not with whom or content. They spoke about NDAs purely in the context that discussions are happening. Nothing more. Until there is detail its nothing more than helpful background that work of that nature has been initiated.

Helpful response to a question asked.

Silence on NDAs?

In my personal direct experience of NDAs relating to technology R&D discussions, its perfectly normal to include wording which specifically excludes public acknowledgement or reference to the EXISTENCE of the NDA.

So you're off the hook with Mrs PB then!😂

Oh dear.

Have Peel Hunt been naughty boys?

I hear little memory bells ringing!!

Agreed:

10yrs drilling up to 100 /Yr

Fund initial development from revenue: with 6 finance NDAs already in place : this let's us negotiate from strength not desperation.

Diluted risk with oil AND gas: LPG badly required by Alaskan industry and SoA very happy to get potential lower cost LPG from us

No Interest in a major partner/farm in UNLESS they add serious value

No interest in sp hype: just delivery

Oilman Dim: laugh. Polite way of saying "Oilman Who?"

We know what we have...and we know more than we've told you.

We've been super conservative: and the upside is clear. Prove us wrong.

If you want a slice.....then put your Big Boy hat on.

Very very good presentation to FINANCERS

Dammit...my post has been slashed

What a great bunch of professionals: I would have loved to have worked with such pragmatists.

My personal "green flags" as a non-industry investor:

-

I don't think I've ever read an RNS like this one🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Perhaps the late reported trades are part of their escape.

Barstewards...I'd like to see them burn in hell. Or at least lose a packet!🤣🤣🤣

Scot must be a total idiot...so do not reply to his questions with data.

Let's just...deflect and hide our heads in the sand.

Shhh....youre not allowed to raise questions like this!

I'm really only interested in getting answers to questions.

As I've said already, my "free shares" are because I invested WAY beyond my means based on the 88e story but managed to trade my investment back, resulting in a holding at no costs.

During all these years the company has yet to do much other than dangle promises and ask for more money.

So when someone asks pertinent questions whether liked or not ..its prudent to find answers.

Now now.

I paid for them all: doubled my money and took a free ride until we produce something.

You mustn't be so emotional. I intend to make even more money from both shares but it does worry me that the only responses to questions are emotional.

Up to now 88e has yet to do anything but ask me for more money. I hope that changes

OK...so more funds from us for 88e (my 3.5m are all "free" so thank you all for ongoing funding .

I think the recent rns and webibar from the neighbours explained the funding plan so all OK there

Dear God...im sorry...but you have to go in the naughty corner with all the other "buy! Buy! Buy!" crowd

I'm looking for an snswer to his question not a comparison to PANR (where I hold about 500k).

And can you rebutt his question with data?

I can't...but I'm sure someone here can offer an intelligent reply.

I'm sitting on about 3.5m shares in case that matters.

Does anyone have a calculation to reply to the question?

We may not like it but it deserves a reasoned response.

Still no changes reported since early September.

Can anyone suggest why? Seems very risky given recent RNSs

Investors will.

Punters won't.

Cya.