Member Info for Greenmachine67

Happy, I’m sorry but those numbers are not true. Pure lithium metal does not exist in real life unfortunately unless it’s under special conditions. The lithium product that cinovec will produce is lithium carbonate. Most cars will require 40-80 kg of lithium carbonate

I’m embarrassed for her. Impeccable timing…….😂😂😂😂

One more box ticked off….EIA/offtake/MOU next. I’d wager that EIA is nailed on for approval. Off to the races……

The rerate timeline is a difficult thing to judge. It will happen when it happens and perhaps once the lightbulb flashes in some as realisation dawns. As each day passes and more "informed" soundbites emanate from the White House then it makes this project more and more feasible. i'll wait......

Absolutely NN, and maybe that is why this weeks presentation mentioned increasing production again (emphasising the ease of doing so) and for me harking back to fingers saying so all those years ago and for his trouble being mocked by the usual suspects.

NN, from recollection the total tonnage moved per annum is going to 3 million tonnes. This correlates nicely with the 60million resource. Remember, we are only going to be mining 13% of the total cinovec resource.

I think if I were to have a stab at the reason why other products were not not mentioned in the dfs I would have to say that due to the size of the project/resource keeping it limited to lithium (for now) helps 3rd party minds focussed ie both industrial and political. In my mind the project has 3 or 4 seperate product streams (if we also include potash) and would undoubtedely result in seperate plant requirements for each constituent. Keep it simple for startup but have the full plan ready to move forward a little later.....

Tungsten processing...........

4. Co-Product Recovery (Mica-Lithium-Tungsten)

In certain industrial contexts, such as in Jiangxi, China, tungsten is managed as a co-product or byproduct during the extraction of lithium from lepidolite mica.

The process focuses on processing the mica for lithium while simultaneously recovering tungsten values from the tailings or intermediate residues using the leaching and solvent extraction methods mentioned above.

Ghin, it would be interesting to find out if you have anything positive to say about this project. From what I can see from your posts is a constant stream of caustic commentary……

Premium bonds?

Another way to possibly work out the tin credit price.......

The Jan 2022 pfs update showed the tin/tungsten credit to be approx $1100. This was based on a tin price of $22k and 29k lithium output. We are now at $50 per tonne tin and 37.5k Lithium product. Do the maths.....

Yesterday’s presentation rekindled mention of byproducts as part of the project.

Slide 14 shows that the measured resource to be 0.08% tin in 60 million tonnes of ore.

This equates to just under 50,000 tonnes of tin concentrate. Do the math @50k per tonne. Over LOM (25 yrs) this equates to approx 2000 tonnes of tin per annum. I’ll let others do the calculation. Would this be an acceptable return by including it in the process flow? Obviously, extra opex/capex but the ore is already above ground so I cannot see it adding too much.

One to watch

Incredible that pointing out the plus points and possible roadmap of this project labels you a ramper. Word to those…….move elsewhere and buy some premium bonds

Https://x.com/RKEquityRocks/status/2010759349145043207?s=20

live now on x

LL, you are spot on. As investors here it sometimes makes you feel guilty when you point out the positives only to be shot down by the naysayer (with an agenda). The rate of rise in the lithium space has been meteoric and perhaps the timing could not have been better for us. The latest rockstock podcast has been a case in point, massive increase in demand up to 2030 is a clue. Where it it will go from here is anyones guess but i'm pretty sure that based on this some of the possible offtakers here will be sharpening their pencils in order to lock in future price contracts.

So no black swan then Jim surely...... your sleepless nights are over.....and at the same time progress on the Li front is also moving

Lucky, I always revert to the nerdy side when “new tech” claims come along. Top left on the periodic table shows where are. All those numbers that accompany them might seem like gobbledygook but the bottom line is that lithium is the lightest metal on earth and nothing can surpass it…..Scotty

As Scotty on Star Trek used to say “ ye canny beat the laws of physics Captain”. It’s a scam

Jim, the hubless wheel design for me gave the game away. On a motorcycle that is the LAST thing you need. Massive increase in unsprung weight and similar increase in gyroscopic effect. Read the reviews of people who have ridden the previous bike. Form over function but nothing more. I think the same will be said of their “battery”. Boutique posers machine that looks great in photos but when your on it you wish you were on a donkey

Come on Jim, enough is enough. If you want why don’t you start a donut forum chat on lse and you can talk about it day and night