Member Info for gotreal

Remember, Charles, he is a non- executive chairman. An advisor not a doer.

Adam1986, it is only LSEs attempt at marking trades as buys or sells based on what the declared spread was at the time the trade was published. But if you believe they are accurate then I am afraid you are fooling yourself. The actual spread if you actually trade is always inside the declared one and the MMs manipulate the declared bid / ask prices so trades appear as the opposite to what they actually are. That way they influence the crowd to either buy or sell to suit their own needs. Do not believe that if its shown as red then its a sell and blue a buy - that is a fiction.

"The ...chromite and chrome ore market size was USD 76.18 billion in 2022...and is expected to reach USD 110.20 by 2028, a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 5.3%."

Where's your evidence?? https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/chromite-and-chrome-ore-market-107461

I disagree ... I deem it manipulation.

Ahhhhh ... there are 3 TR-1s, the one announced today which I agree seems is DKE's fault not to have RNS in a timely fahion. Then there are two RNS' which are not on the LSE website (as they had trouble with the provider for a period) where it is clear Peel left a large gap between executing their trades which were notifiable and reporting them to DKE. DKE took 3 days in both instances to RNS them.

I have to disagree:

5. Date on which the threshold was crossed or reached (by Peel Hunt)

18-Jan-2024

6. Date on which Issuer (Dukemount) notified

09-Feb-2024

I read that as being Peel at fault.

Kalan, I merely call out your deviousness..... which is widely recognised on here.

The posts are not abusive they are truthful. You report them even though they are factually correct and what you were claiming is a nonsense..... 🤡 Your logic is that because JLP haven't produced the full year's copper output already (with 4 months still to go and a statement by the CEO TODAY that the targat of 5,850 t is still the target) then they aren't on track to produce even 3,000t?? Have a lie down why don't you....

Heroric, you are LYING because you said the company is not on track to deliver 3Kt of copperthis year.... when plainly it is. Trying to argue that it hasn't yet done something in the future therefore makes you right is fantastical nonsense. And you have lied yet again because although they said that is what the 3 million would be used for they NEVER REQUESTED IT. It was the result of excess demand by the IIs and as unplanned for of course it would go into working capital. I think you ought to lie down because you are not making much sense and digging an ever deeper hole whilst doing it.

Is that not some sort of city offence to delay the notification of the Peel Hunt offload 12 days from being informed.... ??

We arwe producing 600t / mth copper units at Roan NOW and they have confirmed the target for the year remains the same. Yet another deramping LIAR I see......

Good, stay out and don't come back.

This operator of the Butterball avatar is trying to emulate Kalan, I think, the subtle deramp but picking spurious data to do it. Strange how this one writes such good English compared to usual shift member. As for BT, I think we have the Bexley van driver on shift today. Certainly is desperate juging by all of the emojis and icons at the end of each post .... 🤡

Barclays Cuts Fresnillo PT, Maintains Equalweight Rating

Jan 25, 202412:56 GMT

RBC Reduces Fresnillo PT, Keeps Sector Perform Rating

Jan 29, 202412:51 GMT

Berenberg Cuts Fresnillo PT, Maintains Hold Rating

Jan 29, 202412:54 GMT

JPMorgan Keeps Fresnillo at Neutral, Lowers PT

Jan 30, 202412:44 GMT

🤡

And Fresnillo where he is underwater 25%..... shame. Most analysts have turned negative on FRES.

BT ... "Instead all the cash is all gone, operating costs exceed sales and they missed out on record high cobalt prices." Absolute rubbish.

Choose to lose 50% instead of waiting ..... pah! Rubbish.

Kalan, if you hadn't tried that schoolboy wheeze... "Also a correction to my post I said 9.5p target in 18 months and WHI indicate 3 years to reach 9.9p (albeit a conservative estimate). " I wouldn't have had to correct you.... and Bushy who, "oddly", tried to obfuscate to cover your back. Why is it that certain posters seem to just post "untruths" all the time..... It has reached the point where everyone here knows their agenda and so it really is quite pointless apart from wasting the time of those who will continue to correct the lies. You try to portray the Kalan avatar's character as thoughtful and conservative so your comments have gravitas and you are seen as a voice of experience... It didn't really help with JSE, or WRES, or SAV or GLR now did it?? 😉

WHI value JLP at 9.9p NOW NOT in 3 years ........ you are emulating Bushy..... and fully risked, with a large upside when more concrete information becomes available. "...there is plenty of upside if Jubilee achieves its production goals" "Jubilee’s NEAR-TERM growth potential is real and based on already-secured feedstocks; although capital investment will be required to deliver the growth strategies, capital demands are not expected to be too onerous. We have HEAVILY RISKED the Munkoyo and Waste Rock projects pending a resource update and information on how the material responds to the proposed processing circuit." Also, Paul only takes 30% profit share into account for the ROM project when with services fees to design, operate and manage it it will be more like 42%

Now, you wouldn't want to try to put a damper on a positive report, Kalan, would you....?? 😉