Member Info for GlenFidrich

Net buys are a little over 0.1% of shares in issue, and we are supposed to be excited? paulus47, are you for real? The last time volume spiked (13th March, 2025) the share price fell roughly 25%. Believe me, I'm watching "the larger buys", but you think a 70,000 buy is going to move the needle? "Someone thinks the sp is way undervalued..." Based on what? Volume? Please elaborate, as I'm not really agreeing with your take on the current state of play.

To sad, and others, you wonder why there are some here that "indicate negativity towards development of another compound". Might it be the amount of time, and money, it's taken even to arrive at this juncture with 1801? Also, SRA737 is proving a hard sell, despite all the apparent promise. And from today's RNS: "The Company is assessing the potential next steps for these compounds, including whether to progress one or more into preclinical development." Preclinical development? Really? So we're back to square one now are we? Moreover: "While further optimisation is still required". Okay, so how long will that take? It does, as Potnak stated earlier, feel like a pivot (for whatever reason). I'm reminded of the whole AGILE RNS which was initially well-received and then turned into a damp squib. I really hope that I'm wrong on all this, but I'm sensing BoD smoke and mirrors from today's RNS.

Laz, I'm following the news like a mouse following the Pied Piper, but it just seems that I'm chasing my tail. I wish they would stick to one compound and focus their collective (and impressive) brain power on that (i.e. 1801). They appear to be in the plate-spinning business at the moment, I'm sorry to say.

*outstripping supply. Apologies.

I hear you, Cygnus7, and you're right. Investing in silver has been frustrating over the last 15 years or so, to say the least. But if you think gold is going to perform well as a hedge against inflation and a falling dollar, then silver will follow, albeit kicking and screaming! Industrial demand for silver is now outstripping demand, and the bullion banks (led by JPM) are increasingly losing their grip on the market (which they have controlled and manipulated for years). A much more well-informed commentator on the subject than me is Peter Krauth (author of 'The Great Silver Bull'). You might check him out on YouTube/X.

The gold to silver ratio (or the number of silver ounces to one ounce of gold) is currently actually 100 to 1 (not 150 to 1). But considering that for every ounce of gold mined there are roughly 10 ounces of silver mined, this ratio has to narrow at some point, and therefore the price of silver has to (at least) double relative to the current gold price, although one suspects the price of silver could perform much better than that should the bullion banks lose control of the derivatives market for silver (which appears to be happening). This should augur well for the pure silver mine companies, and by association the explorers, for whom investment has been hard to secure hitherto. We could well be on the cusp of something here. Fingers crossed.

One way of acquiring shares, I guess, without seemingly having to pay for them! I kind of wonder if someone is accumulating a large quantity of shares but doing it by stealth, in minute tranches, to avoid raising any alarm bells, flying under the radar, so-to-speak? All I can say is, if so, they're making a right pig's breakfast of it!

What's with these tiny trades (3, 4, 5, and 6)? Anyone? Is it some kind of weird MM code? Are they trying to convey some subliminal message? All way too cryptic for my simplistic brain.

Is the plan to lower interest rates (crush the dollar), make borrowing rates attractive again, and help small cap stocks (e.g. Sareum) to raise capital cheaply? Because God knows, in a high interest environment, raising capital has been a major problem for our BoD. Just a thought...

Correction. 50%.

Seriously?!! Up 43%?

I'm sorry, Potnak, but you seem to delight in sticking the boot in when the sp is depressed (akin to kicking someone when they're down). As for your quip about the Emperor, he may well be naked (perhaps like your short) but you're stating the bleeding obvious merely to add fuel to the fire of worry. And then your attempt to twist the Edison report - a weird thing to point out at this stage - as if we all didn't realize that this is essentially a binary play. The molecules either work, and are safe, or they don't/aren't. 'Twas ever thus. For me, gaining control of 737 is a positive, and maybe makes a potential deal even more appealing. But of course you fail to see the significance of that, and wish to focus on the possibility that 737 could be Sareum's last throw of the dice after all else has failed. Finally, I really can't remember when you have contributed one shred of scientific evidence, either to give credence to your fear that Sareum is doomed, or (like SOG) why there are reasons to be optimistic. But hey, each to their own. I just don't understand why you remain invested in a share about which you seem so negative, is all.

Potnak - ever the optimist. Your worry is now everyone's worry. Thanks.

matty, you might have spared us the gory details! anyway, this from wikipedia: the song is described as "a tale of love under stress, dedication and survival..." kind of sums up life as a sar shareholder, methinks. it goes on: "'the only way is up' is where bad house music crashes into *** seventies disco and ends up in the top 10." say no more, matty. your secret is safe with us!

Laura is really Riddler in drag/disguise. He/she has been pumping PYC for years. I remember a while back seeing in PYC similarities to DMTR, and expressing my concerns here. I was immediately shot down by Riddler (as was, then). DMTR had just fallen 90%, thanks to a brutal cash call/dilution. PYC was around the 5p mark at that time. You do the math. By the way, DMTR was subsequently delisted, and shareholders lost everything. All best.

"Not having met members of the BoD, who exactly is tasked with getting the Sareum story 'out there' ?" Seemingly, not even God knows! The paucity of replies to your valid question, Mike, says it all really. I've been invested here for over 10 years and I haven't a clue, although there was some lady charged with "Investor relations" at some point I believe.

We had a couple of 4-5% up days last week I think, so nothing to write home about today. Volatility will be the name of the game going forward. Just ensure you have your target sp at which you'll be prepared to sell and the rest is noise. 300p should be doable in the next 12 - 24 months so a cheeky 50% upside from here. Not to be sniffed at...

Plus, I'm fully expecting the dividend to be reinstated in March. With an AISC target of $1,587-$1,687 per gold equivalent ounce, and gold nearing $3,000 per ounce, surely the board will deem it fit to reward shareholders?

You're my hero...

I think there have been enough hints that the data are good, in which case the "when" (re: release of said data) is almost immaterial. I fully expect Monday 30th, or Tuesday 1st, to be the date when all is revealed...

Matty, don't be too hard on yourself. There are plenty of us here who were sitting on 1,000% profits, but chose to hang on. Don't beat yourself up! I was seduced by the promise of 1801 being fast-tracked via the AGILE programme, but which came to nothing, of course. It merely highlights the importance of having an exit strategy is all. Investing is a learning curve, that's for sure.