Over ambitious or under funded7 Dec 2018 16:43
Partridge has been offering an ambiguous defense of the team today and I have enjoyed the not so drunken ramblings of Trellis and Fellrunner.
The question that I have in mind is would a well funded major have drilled away as they did in Algeria until they hit the jackpot. I assume that in the early days of Oil and Gas in North Africa they were able, once a hit had been made to drill close to and radiate out until duster time.
With todays technology were we too ambitious in the initial stages of morocco? With hindsight perhaps a closer inspection around TE5, and perhaps TE1 and 2 might have given an earning field by now and then move out.
However JP has always said the Sound Energy would be a high risk, high reward, rinse and repeat and sell company and we have had all of these to date, except perhaps for some like me who did not take the reward when we were 90+. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
No matter how I feel about the way this last week has gone I now feel that I was over ambitious and did not obey the simple rule of a profit should always be taken to de-risk with AIM.
Lesson learnt in this case and onwards and upwards to a success (or not) with TE10 and 11.
No-one to blame but myself. JP has assembled a good team and I do not believe the conspiracy idea with Schlumberger on board as they are world leaders. High risk is what the man said and high risk is what we have....but what if
Ginger Bear