Member Info for Giancotti

Wow TC! You’re a keyboard warrior too.

What a shame the dynamics here don’t allow some info to be shared without the wider world knowing so we can meet up somewhere with no witnesses!

Mmm your arrogance has no limits and your lack of applying any thought to my previous post highlights your shortcomings TC. You don’t think I may have been in a hurry, perhaps someone waiting or somewhere else to be? I admit I’m no chemist but I was simply hoping someone had researched these products and could help my understanding.
I also did well enough in my field to retire from corporate life at 45 and since then my ROI on a number of stocks has averaged 36% per year so although I may seem to be justifying myself to your continued arrogance and rudeness I have been reasonably successful.

Big/Vet
Spot on!

I have a lot of experience in similar businesses based on R&D tech and these remain great ideas and potentially businesses but the board seem to continue with an R & D mindset ie spend spend spend and eventually it’ll come together. Add to that the age old promises to keep our attention ie SD and billion dollar companies.
Recent recruitment aside, it’s time for a change at the top and some hard assed business leaders to take the helm.
Interesting to see some of the blind belief posters here even recognizing the issues here now.
I’m sticking with my investments as I still think there’s some great value here but as one of you said, delivery is well over due.

Good question Badsterman

Thank you Lowlander for the detailed and educated opinion. For the record it wasn’t your response that I considered arrogant.
At the end of the day we all want the same outcome but it’s very frustrating reading the same old same old over confidence when all people want is educated opinion rather than salesmanship.
Thx again

I know my investments my questions were directed at the competition.
I noticed these alternatives in the store and my questions were asking about these competitive products ie Has anyone researched these? Tried these etc? Rather than simply accept the Tek claims.

I must admit I’m amazed at these arrogant responses and the assumption that because I ask the question I don’t know where I’ve put my money. Perhaps thinking about why I’m asking and keeping an open mind would be more appropriate!

Wow! Some very arrogant answers!!

So, these are substitutes? Not 66% reduced sodium salt??
I only saw these briefly on the shelf I haven’t studied them. Have you?

Just seen two low sodium table salt options in Waitrose. One ‘So-Low’ sodium from Saxa and the other ‘Low Salt’ at 66% lower sodium content!
I wasn’t aware of these already being out there and 66% less is quite a competitor!
These are pricey though at £6.86 and£5.29 per kg.

I guess price is going to be critical obviously but I’d like to understand more from Micro Salt on the benefits of our product or have we missed the boat!?

TC I think you should look up the meaning of the word arrogance.
I simply believe in supported info and fact rather than estate agent like talk to over promote.
However, as I said, this is genuinely great news.

A lot of over stated and unsupported BS posted here for a very long time. However, the salt news is potentially a launch bad for something genuinely huge.
This could now really gain traction across the wider food industry and also offers likely buy out options.

Yea wasn’t far off really!

Blind not bling of course

Initially disappointed to see the drop off in SP this morning after some bling euphoria on here yesterday but Bering in mind the recent history of the TEK SP I’ll be very happy going into the weekend with a stable 20p.
That I hope will be a good footing for further news and SP gain and give a chance for investors to catch up on a positive couple of days via press and usual investigative routes.

I look at it over the period I’ve invested which is about two years. Over that period there has been no pattern whatsoever. I think it’s you who cherry picks to support your statements just like the over inflated BS you write to self promote and support your investment with nothing substantial to back it up.

I think a lot of people look at these boards for facts and tangible info to support their investment but a lot are extremely board of your unsubstantiated BS.

Actually Bell is 22% down and Tek 9% up on the year but that doesn’t prove anything, a sample of three weeks is a ridiculous sample size to support that statement.

Irrelevant as an historical gauge!

Not even three weeks into the year so that’s irrelevant.
There doesn’t seem to be any pattern with this stock. The spin offs go up, Tek often goes down, Tek release some half decent update it goes up a small amount then drops.

The only thing that will take this up and sustain it will be profit. Let’s hope we see that this year because it’s been a long wait.

At last, some encouraging news. My only concern is manufacturing capacity ie can we make enough to meet demand at this crucial stage of having the leading tech before we see an alternative or the Chinese copy and produce themselves.
Other that that, if you can afford to sit on the investment for 18-24 months this will pay 2,3maybe 4 fold.

Thank you yes that is strange!

What was the tweet please?

Whatever the reason this SP is ridiculously low and only strong figures are going to improve things.
Mad with such amazing technology with all the possible markets available crying out for such a tech that we are here.
The potential will be realised I’m sure but so frustrating to see the SP so low!