RE: called BARC18 Jun 2020 10:01
I actually work in the pensions and financial services profession so i am aware of some of the rules and issues.
Re a holding ion a SIPP, whilst a payment of a tax reclaim direct to the plan holder (and not the nominee) would be treated as a unauthorised payment and severely taxed by the UK, there is nothing to stop the nominee/platform undertaking the reclaim and really they should so so for all their SIPP holders- even if they charged a fee for it.
re my ISA, my platform (ii) have sent me a certificate allowing me to pursue a claim. It shows my holding, the nominee details and the total gelding of the nominee along with the tax deducted. To be fair to ii they have told me that this can't be put back into the ISA and if it was it would use part of my annual allowance.
This isn't a big issue for me, but the reclaim on the SIPP is in excess of £1,000 so i am disappointed with the lack of assistance by ii on it.
So for the ISA it is ok to have a tax reclaim paid directly to the holder and not the plan and there are no negative consequences other than it cannot be put back into the ISA without using some of the ISA allowance. But for the pension, the reclaim can't or shouldn't go straight to the plan holder and really needs to go back to the plan itself.
Separately, but related, I also hold a small number of SLE in another ISA with IG Index. To date they are yet to credit my account and the last email i had from them around 10 days ago said they hadn't received any payment. Sadly they haven't responded to my follow up emails yet!
As has been said- great that SLE are rewarding shareholders (god knows i feel like i need a reared as a long term holder), but shame the process is so messy!