Member Info for Fyoz

"I will have a holiday villa in the canaries if we can get to 50😉."

Let's build our own small development, Quadrise Sunset Villa's . . . 🤣

ps. A 10% increase each trading day gets us over 9p by Xmas

"If it's waste, I presume that it's quite cheap then.

Or, if it's waste, pay us to take it away . . .😉

"I guess we should say 'prospective client', but everyone knows what you mean."

Seems they refer to them all as 'partners' these days

"No. One can be mistaken for company news and encourage click through links to find mention of MSC or Morocco or emulsion fuels. The other can't. There's a difference."

Yes, the difference being one was about biofuels used in rail transport, a potential market for QED, the other was a meaningless anecdote about working in a petrol station

"We all have access to Google. This stuff just clogs up the board"

You're kidding right?

"I, in fact, used to work the night shift at a shell garage while at uni. Got a gas bottle thrown through the plate glass. Good times."

Fair enough CFP, just my sledgehammer wit, I can't help it

But, he did lay this out here . . . "0.6p is more likely to come before 6p" so let's see how things turn out 🙄

"Happy with my profit and the GAP is still there"

Yep, between your ears lad . . . 🤣

Still, if you accidentally made money out trading QED then well done to you

I've just sent a twitter message to the UK Climate minister (also Energy Security and Net Zero) making him aware of Quadrise and BioMSAR Zero

I don't really expect a reply, but you'd think that a government on the ropes would be looking for some good news anywhere?

Power their ships with 30% water”.

And, 'burns like gas'

Is it too much to hope that some industry big-hitters are finally catching on to this ?

"Who's fault is it that? It's the fickle PI's own fault, that's who"

Well I've read some nonsense on this BB over the years, but congratulations for the most inane statement ever. You're actually blaming the lack of take up on PI's? If the company had structured it right it would have been better received. We PI's don't get the benefit of the presentation made to II's, we have to make the decision based on what's in the public domain, no winks and nudges for us. And then we have to choose to subscribe even though we could buy cheaper at the click of a mouse. To even suggest that the fund raise wasn't successful was because of fickle PI's is simply laughable

Many on here think you're a fool, but you've now proved it to the rest of us

"they had their chance of cheap stock and many blew the chance, as such they should not be given a second chance"

But they weren't cheap, you could actually buy for less on the open market. PI's shunned the offer because there was no incentive to buy directly from the company. It was poorly packaged, there should have been some incentives added such as warrants, hence why it was not very well supported

"Such a massive opportunity to blow the roof off the marketing machine."

Personally I'll settle for just blowing the bl**dy doors off . . . 🤣

Hf14 "It must be very frustrating for MSC as they have been ready to start this trial for a number of months."

How do you know that? The last information we had was that the trials are expected to commence in Q1 2024 provided the relevant permits are received in time. Have all the permits been issued?

Hf14 "If they do the costs of an open offer will be more than the proceeds. They only had 38% last time and that included excess shares taken up."

I believe they structured the offer wrongly last time, there was no incentive to buy shares through the offer than on the open market, (other than directly supporting the company). I'm sure the take up would have been much higher if they'd attached some meaningful warrants. If they need to raise again, I hope they've learned a few lessons and will structure it in a way that is more attractive to existing holders

CFP "I have not got a clue who is arguing with who now"

Love it, post of the day 🤣

Pigfase "Theirs always a few who try to put other down ,as i suffer from dyslexia sometimes get sentences wrong. "

I think it's short term memory loss, as you seem to have forgotten all the snidey posts you make about the LTH's here. Funny how the ones having a pop, cry foul when it's directed back at them. Actually no, not funny, PATHETIC 🙄

"if this share go's above 2 pence I will be able to buy a new top of the range phone"

Thanks pigfase, confirms my theory about you, not a clue where this is heading

"I'm as qualified as you Fyoz"

Undeniably, but I'm not advising people to wait for an RNS

"here's my brass neck - I have the margin to make that choice and the right to post here!"

Undeniable again, but I asked you if you think you're qualified to advise potential investors, which you're clearly not

"

As I'm not currently invested you might think why am I posting ? Well there's going to be folk out there who think this is going somewhere NOW but I would say wait a bit for that all important RNS because without it you will be joining a long list of victims who get attracted to the QFI / QED dream and find that the MMs don't agree the next day and the day after that etc etc."

So you lost money with QED but you think you're qualified to offer advice to potential investors?

The sheer brass neck of some people . . .

Any kind of sustainable contract will return us to double figure IMO. We'd be greatly derisked by it, and new investors will begin to see the possibilities. A decent contract with MSC will blow this SP out of the water. The future potential for our process is still mind boggling when you consider marine, power generation, industrial heating, tar sands refining etc