Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Not often me and Jimmy agree but Micky is nothing more than a parasitic worm feeding on the volatility created by the FOMO.
Trusting his advice on this stock would be like trusting a fox to look after your chickens...
I know I keep banging on about it but volatility is no good for this stock... it brings in all sorts of parasitic toss pots like these jokers.
As you all cheer while the sp sky rockets I am incredulous at the short sighted naivety displayed by the holders.
Steady increases day on day gains are where I want to see this going not the rollercoaster to nowhere...
Well maybe not the middle, what I mean is inbetween. The middle, as a prediction, is still worthy of a good old fashioned sectioning under the mental health act...
Harhoo *
Harpoon reckons £24
Helx Reckons 6p
I reckon somewhere in the middle.
Care to elaborate?
Personally I don’t really care about an individual buying into a stock and don’t believe it adds any weight whatsoever.
They didn’t mention anything about streamed content in that link. Did you read the conversation thread? Or just jump in half ****ed?
Don’t worry about being argumentative you don’t come across that way at all. For once there is a meaningful discussion happening on these boards.
I would be intrigued to see these boards and any modifications which were made to them, I would imagine that it would be similar to a green screen where the image is added post production.
Very impressive!
The update lacked the required specificity to give us a solid rise. Numbers speak louder than words. They will come in good time.
A stream is simply a render of the game sequence... this would mean that the platform on which the host is playing will need to render the sequence for each viewer at any sort of meaningful scale this would likely bring the platform to its knees.
It’s a bit like saying that the boards at the side of a pitch on sky sports will show different ads depending on the viewer. It’s implausible. Not impossible but implausible.
I fail to see how you can possibly tailor adverts to someone watching a stream seems like snake oil to me. They will undoubtedly see the adverts but suggesting that these can be tailored to that individual is simply implausible.
Shut up nobhed lol
You mean, in your opinion I am wrong? You state it as fact that’s the only reason I query it.
The updates have been as regular as they need to be. They have informed us of new games, new partnerships, new appointments etc.
The problem hasn’t been the news flow... they have reported everything that’s been relevant. The problem has been that the market hasn’t responded to the news. More news isn’t the answer here.
In my view credibility has been the problem... reports of news shouldn’t change but we need to be delivering more progress with credible forecasts on how revenue will be impacted. Not a £10m revenue claim to placate the markets and bolster the share price so you can offload at 20p a share. Their reputation was in tatters after that stunt.
I still maintain the position that spamming news that adds no value will do more harm than good. Focus more on marketing to customers and closing deals than marketing to investors.
Progress is the name of the game here.
I am not suggesting they clam up, publishing news that is relevant and demonstrates meaningful progress is the way forward. I know you aren’t advocating that the company spams news in order to artificially raise the share price so that new investors get a crappy deal but that’s how it comes across.
The next 6 months needs to be approached in a level headed, controlled and structured way so that the market doesn’t get shocks and surprises.
Release trickle news so the market thinks it knows what’s coming and then release the evidence. Like they are with the results this time around.
We still don’t know what they are but they are good.
No thanks, more of the same please BoD. Steady progress meaningful progress, this is a marathon and not a sprint. Pushing an RNS every time someone foes for a s.hit does nothing to provide value to investors and attracts parasites who feed on the volatility.
So to reiterate I’ll have 12 more months of infrequent updates please Mr Draper.
I think this is likely to be traders taking profit.
Sorry my statement was poorly articulated. I mean to say that without the numbers to substantiate how much they have exceeded by its impossible to price this in accurately.
Waiting on the hard evidence. It’s above expectation but there is nothing to support that
So how are these views monetised?