Member Info for Fruitsnveg

Agree Flashgem, they moan because it scuppers their plans. Best ignore them and DYOR.

Agree fully with your post RookieInvestor.

True Richer. I still can’t un-see the image Woodstock gave us some weeks ago of SNG001 being akin to ‘a lady leaving me to powder her nose, knowingly’ , or such. I hope I got that right Wooody ;-)

...and Stale is an amnagram of Tesla. I wonder if that's what got him riled :-).

This looks good for Monday, nice way to finish the week. GLA.

For the explanation Barry, kudos.

Sharebag,

“ I do disagree with shouting out 20p etc when they are selling”. Exactly my point.

Let’s see some more action here from the investors promoting this. Over to them. I’m a patient sort.

Well I did say they were crap at analysing data and I stand by my 20 years of guffawing at their witless offerings.

Aston, what they failed to analyse are 2 particularly attractive sides to the business (telemedecine, and of course the extensive pulonary bio-bank which would be a very sweet acquisition for any pharma in the pulmonary space, and moreover not lost of our institutional investors eyeing thos aspects up too...). As I said, analysis is not Motley's strong point, selling subscriptions is. It's all about the $$$.

But do DYOR. GL.

Experience is a cruel teacher Tiger. Next time I suggest you stay in, or shut the door on your way out.

Tiger although the article is new, the news ref Bitance is not. This has been knocking around since at least October. It's an internal process/compliance issue. A few ruffled feathers, some free deramping fodder, that's it imo. Life goes on.

THanks London_B. I'll take a look. Hard to keep up with all the news on various BB's. That's OK, I know you didn't say it was definite/he just alluded but I know he has a liking for DOT and was an early investor so it wouldn't surprise me. We'll find out in time, whatever it may be I have faith in his vision.

London_Balling, sorry just catching up you - said PW hinted at "the potential for mining things other than BTC and ZEC", which video did he mention this in, can you tell me? It will save me time ploughing through all recent ones...thanks.
I too think Polkadot would be cracking choice and prove a long term win.

I think Baz has more than enough fingers in enough pies to bank any required profits Shipper. About Ash and JM, yes I wonder too, time will tell.

I agree Terrier, you can't look at one or 2 investors in isolation though it does pay to know their MO. Genuine investor here, looking forward to more news.

Motley couldn't research their way out of a manky sandwich bag. But they have to keep those subscriptions $$$ rolling, so you know, pinch of salt, etc.

I don't.

Yes, I know his MO, he's a known quantity...

Baz " I could of sold at over 3p I didn't as I held and still do for a transformational RTO" Reynolds. - referencing RDGC on 22nd Feb.
That's some shtick, Baz.

Was plannning to add a chunk today, let's see how this plays out first...

Why has he reduced? Genuine question.

On the contrary, I think a lot of people are happy to wait for results to see £3. We can agree to disagree, right Teamwork?

Following the usual barometer of that...I'd say yes.