Member Info for Foxhill

So presumably you’re hoping that the Iranians have managed everything brilliantly courtesy of domestic input, with the exception of security?

Sort of WSG “soon” - ie Ongoing.

I know nobody takes me seriously.

Those bored with waiting for something substantial to materialise - eyeing alternative opportunities elsewhere.

It’s not like they’re (put that in just for you Steve) stepping out of a share trending upward, is it?

‘Basic grammar, if you want to be taken seriously by anyone.

Their mouths.

Not ‘there’

Or They’re

THEIR!!

“Cut!...”

I’ll keep my eyes peeled for that spike!

The BoD’s credibility - is aligned with the SP - it’s seriously sub nominal.

I anticipate more meaningless, immeasurable ambiguity - with caveats on top.

That’d be a first too, I think. I’m not sure anything ever actually dies at WSG. They just go into abeyance/cryo’.

Lying?

“How not to be an entrepreneur”?

Sale of the ferry might improve next years EBITDA!! Lmao!!

Unless they sell it before this year’s results.

No $hit Sherlock.

Amateurs.

I’d respectfully point out that we have NEVER had a full and thorough update. We know nothing about the number of MoU’s signed, let alone any measurable progress on them or any other MS opportunity.

But, as you rightly say, where has anything they’ve ever said, inferred, expected - ever got us.

Nowhere.

The African contract looking more and more like an end of year sop - in lieu of the “at least” expectation.

Another one to get lost/forgotten in the pampas surrounding Bumbly!!

And you have no idea if they have made any meaningful progress.

That’d be a first!!

Whatever the strategy - the product has been ready enough to hawk around to clients for six months plus. The acid test is ordering more. They haven’t yet...

Or if they have it RNS worthy.

;-)

Fold it? Delist. ‘Supportive investors rescue the new ‘private’ enterprise, heroically saving jobs and seeing the potential the market didn’t. Then sign a contract? Just a thought.

It’ll just be noise until something substantive is agreed ‘twixt Iran and the USA - and even then they’ll probably need to look at what’s been agreed before they can decide whether they can move forward. Assuming the opportunity still exists.

There was once, a question put to a director by an irritating shareholder, as they ‘walked’ across the (unfinished) drive of Bumbly Towers. Something along the lines of; presumably, if we land something akin to the Middle East contract (‘didn’t know it was Iran back in the day) WSG will need to accommodate more staff here”, both glanced lovingly at ‘BT.
The plan, (might have been an option) it transpired, was to extend BT to the left hand side, viewed from the front.

Perhaps the mystery security building under construction in Iran that might be for us, rendered this plan/option redundant? I have google Bumbly’s local planning a couple of times. Can’t find any applications.

So we probably don’t need to extend for Africa..or any of the anonyMoU’s