Strategic Review9 Nov 2022 12:09
So lets look at the SR in overview priorities
1. We have ENSA to sort out. We either raise $3bln and go to production or we seek partners or we seek a sale or we float ENSA on US markets like Rio did with Turquoise hill. Any other options out there?
2. We have a priority folio of exploration targets. We either raise capital to explore them. Use capital from ENSA sale or IPO to explore them or JV partner deals and reduce ownership by get free carry or zero Capex costs to PEA? Any other options?
3. We have another 50 licence blocks with roughly $7.5m required spend / Capex or relinquish them for minor fee. We've apparently be in discussions with various interested parties over 'packaging' these up for JV's or sale. Overall, the Capex commitment is around $400m.
4. Porvenir - PEA due soon and then what are the options? Raise funds, do deals/JV's with Valuestone, Lundin, Codelco and so on? What's next for Porvenir? PFS? DFS? Use funds from ENSA sale to take it to production??
There are a few other things to consider such as stream deals, loans, CB's and so on but that falls under point 1.
As mentioned before, I believe the Osisko $50m is not restricted to ENSA (or they would have said so) and that might have been the main reason for not using Franco or Boliden. $50m is a sizeable wedge when you consider that PFS2 is virtually complete, zero exploration is going on apart from rock chip samples stuff etc. So question is... what's the forward plan for Porvenir...? Monetise it / swap in / out deal with Sunstone/Lundin and do some combo drilling on warintza? Who knows. But we'll find out soon.