Member Info for FlyingHigher

A great summary. Assuming there is no money from a settlement, what value would you place on the company at this stage? 15x Ebit? It looks vastly overvalued.

The patents surround the method of mass production of CFQDs, so my guess is that would cover other use cases, granting Samsung usage of them everywhere. This is another reason I find what has been indicated absolute madness.

exactly, but perhaps if he were honest he would.

The same rhetoric that our good friend Mike used to spout

LOAM selling again today I imagine, down and down we go.

Can somebody post that here please as I can't see it? The lower end could be with due consideration for global sales and compensation for future royalties, then subtract legal costs.

You're right Nanonano, we'll sit and wait to see what happens now.
Gigawitt, you repeatedly make the claim that this is in some way tactical in the best interests of Nanoco.
It absolutely isn't because the value that Nanoco have just walked away from far exceeds that of any business prospects it has in the pipeline. Edison can't do any revenue forecasts because it's so unclear, yet somehow Nanoco are focusing on business. That's completely illogical.
The only thing that makes sense is the funder making a quick buck. LOAM are upset about this so are running for the door and the whole thing will be forever remembered by the long term holders here as an absolute shambles!

It all stinks. The funder has just shafted Nanoco.
Nanoco will be left with little money, no display prospects and flowering up the sensing market to stop a complete exodus.
20p on the cards if there is no meaningful compensation

HenryHistorian - sorry, I meant the litigation funder

True but it's not the point. Why would they be selling if there was the prospect of a game-changing settlement as some here still seem to want to believe?
The point is they're selling because there's a very realistic possibility of a disappointing deal with Samsung where Nanoco retains little or nothing, causing the share price to tank.
Read the signs!

They might be selling out completely in which case this has further to fall.
If Mintz pulled the plug on the legal case to get out with a profit, LOAM might be put out and selling to preserve their profits.
However you look at this, it doesn't bode well.
Read the signs, remain objective!

They may as well do that

Yh LOAM want out

Shearclass it's a disgrace

Yes it is if that's true. It happens all the time. The FCA are a farce.

Or another possibility is LOAM can see what deal is now likely and are therefore getting out quick before it's announced

3.8% sold! Woah! They've clearly had enough and they won't stop here necessarily. Last one out turn off the lights.
Very strange, perhaps it wasn't them who drove the settlement, perhaps they wanted to hang on and are now annoyed with the BoDs decision like me. This could go a lot lower now and then really low if the deal disappoints. What a shambles.

point 4 - My suggestion was that LOAM were possibly pulling the strings not the litigation funder.
This is speculation off the back of LOAM's reductions, which seemed odd if they were intent on going through with a highly profitable trial.
point 5 - Words absolutely necessary. The edison update leaves room for the possibility of nothing after all costs are factored in.

Or even go back to listing and look overall.
The over trajectory has been decline and quite a rapid one at that

Oh yh how time flies, 7 years then. Down from 150p+