Member Info for Feeks

That must be WSG Aiming!? Good luck with TEK

I don't think they would want to put out an RNS saying how much they are suing for, as it would look a bit crass and maybe even counter-productive to their case. Nanoco and its lawyers will know how jolly well much is at stake. I would say that on any reasonable analysis the amount involved is very large indeed - IMO it is most likely to be several billion dollars.

It is pure guesswork but I predict that any final settlement would be not less than $1bn, and that a court could well award around 2 or 3 times that amount. Samsung's accounts will show just how many billions they have made on QLED Sales. It is already a huge amount, and still growing, and the figures I have quoted would represent just a tiny fraction of that sum, maybe less than 10%.

We have seen it all before. It's why I am backing Nanoco.

https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-nucurrent-lawsuit-846179/

https://www.scmp.com/news/world/middle-east/article/3117154/saudi-crown-prince-mohammed-bin-salman-plans-car-free-green

Parties are required to attempt ADR / mediation. I would personally dispute the narrative that Nanoco have delayed at all - why is it assumed they were sitting and watching when they have been working hard to settle the dispute, stress test the case and finally, issue proceedings?

Did a professional IP outfit risk $10m on a roll of tbe dice...? Nope. They will believe they have a winning case, and if you ask me Samsung was trying to drag things out with the recent licence negotiations prior to commencement of the claim

No assumptions needed frostbar12 as ME told us in the Directors talk interview (14 Jult 2020) that multiple parties - including world leaders in the IP litigation space - had spent nearly an entire year going over the patent infringement case with a fine toothcomb representing a process akin to a mock trial etc.. A litigation funder has also staked, potentially, a sum in excess of $10m of its own money on the outcome of the case and so the sort of negative speculation doing the rounds here - that there might be some fundamental flaw in the case - is laughably wide of the mark IMO. Given the wilful infringeement dimension damages could escalate massively by the time this is over. By my reckoning on the basis of the numbers ME has stated (14m Samsung tv's sold by July 2020 at a premium of around $1,000 a set) we could easily be looking at an overall claim value of around 2.5 x $500-$1bn which would make for a very large special dividend around a year or two from now, maybe. Those sort of sums would only put a small dent in Samsung's profit from this IP infringement and might even be seen as an extremely conservative assessment, but it's the sort of sum I'd expect minimum for an out of court settlement. I am very happy to wait and hoover up more shares at a miserable 10p

I think the form factor is a big improvement on what I have seen offered by other companies

Although I was not too excited by the glasses before, surely they would be a lot more convenient for runners than wearing ear buds and separate prescription eyeglasses or prescription shades? I am interested by that type of.functionaltiy. It would also presumably be capable of dealing with work voice calls in ther
same way as bluetooth headphones do now without broadcasting the sound to the room?

Just waking from my 20 year slumber....

Why dont they change direction ? Make extra salty snacks using the same salt content as rivals. They would sell, sell, sell all day long.

I'm ecstatic

I've been watching / investing in this for c. 10 years. Just added again: 56895 shares bought at 8.788p

How so?

But what does on track mean exactly?

Well the rumours are flying now. We've only ever needed to reach iron ore price equlibrium to bring this to life

Merry Christmas everyone!

Merry Christmas everyone.

The real question is how long will it take for Eden to generate a sustainable revenue stream to justify 30p let alone 100p. It's going to take time and patience so 30p would be attractive to some long suffering shareholders

If it is not that then it could be just another contract extension with Corteva. I had a t/o pencilled in for around January time too. It make sense as it puts Eden and its shareholders out of its misery; Corteva gets its hands on valuable IP for a snip and can also give it the funding it really needs (it needs more than the £10m Eden have raised). 30p would be cheap for a t/o, but I would take it and move on