Member Info for Fastfood

He holdeth no shares. IMO Allan is purposely not communicating with the Private Investor. Only the bare minimum via RNS. Following advice from the Americans ? Radio Silence. The Significant Shareholders will be communicated to regularly. So there is a split.

Sorry / 2 month decline from Jan 16 2.6p to current day opening SP. Anyway the SP went up 10/15% on just 2 million so… Clear evidence now that not a lot of Shares in the pot below 2.5.

Looks to me like a Day Trader who saw opportunity after 3 month decline to purchase 2 million and probably end up retaining 1 million of it by end of the day. Net profit around £2/£300 Good work imo esp considering the spread.

More buying. Not in any great Volume but obvs no Shares in the pot. 2.5 now paid.

Imagine a World where this gene is removed before they have offspring ? The next generation. You then eradicate 99% of Lung Cancer.

Yes Brondby Good Post.

The calculations re Cost are skewed / because very quickly you are going to have a multiple of people needing support / treatment. The goal has to be to reduce the average age upon which person is screened. Thus completing Full population screening. This is how you work towards complete eradication of Lung Cancer and “others”.

The Cost will surely go up for Treatment due to Full population screening and Treatment over now multiple years. But then again / We will know who possesses the faulty Ciz1b gene won’t we ?

Tectonic. Forgive my innocence but I would say the World has never had a Plan for an outcome of Cancer detection so early in the process ? I think they better formulate one if tens of thousands are going to asking / expecting help.

At the moment 99% of detection is too late.

That’s going to completely flip if this Test is the real deal.

Demand for a Care Pathway will multiply exponentially and over multiple years instead of end of life. That in itself will be an astronomical cost.

The Test has to be part of a complete integrated package.

So for me / Care pathway infrastructure has to be good to go before you begin production en mass. To say this is nothing to do with Ciz is a bit naive imo.

If you want to work towards completely eradicating Lung Cancer / you have to firstly convince the patient to have the Test or “A” Test. Treatment to begin early but now over 30 years instead of 5 ? If you can demonstrate to the patient that a Care Pathway is in place which extends life expectancy / then you’d like to think the patient would choose to complete the Test.

If there was no real Care Pathway and only potentially bad news / you’d think the patient would avoid the Test like the plague !! ie : No Consent.

Now / Integrate the Test into en mass blood screening for 40yr MOT / then once again / You’d better have a Care in place to support. For potentially 10’s/20’s of thousands of patients per Annum.

Everything needs to be aligned before you make the Test available to the public / and esp mass screening.

Zzzzzz…

You have 1000 positive Tests. Ok you are now at early stage lung cancer which means / untreated / your life expectancy is reduced to between X and Y. I’m sorry but we haven’t any Treatment available but have a nice day.

Not going to happen is it ? You need to make sure you have adequate Care pathway Treatment available so that you can extend life if untreated. I maintain / you need this as part of the Plan before you sign off on Production. To do so otherwise is irresponsible.

What you gonna do with 100.000 Positive Tests ?

People will only take the Test if they know that a Positive result will lead to an increased chance of extending life expectancy.

Happy to discuss further.

Night.

It’s all about Cost. If the cost comes in at £100 / then that would capture 10x more potential than one currently costing £1000/£1500. So then you have those people knocking at your door. Heck / Alan quotes the numbers Worldwide. The fact our Test is designed to eliminate the competition on Price and Reliability / Tells me this will go mass production. So once again / you better be able to cope with demand for care pathway Post Test.

Au Revior.

If end to end care pathway / infrastructure is not able to cope with potential rise in demand as a result of the Test / then one would think someone would look at buying us out to put us on the shelf so to speak (To buy time). Heck / We would need to Sell as we have no money. We would want to Sell / They would want to buy. Always a possibility.

I really don’t think you can Start Production unless end to end Care infrastructure is in place. Maybe someone with experience in pharma could discuss this topic.

Good evening.

No haven’t changed my mind as I am still Invested. I have realised I may need more patience.

Imagine a World where by the Faulty gene is not only identified but removed upon a Positive Test. Now… in that situation Every man and his dog would be having a Test yes ? Wouldn’t that be something.

So getting to Production phase means lots of connotations. In fact it’s massive. So for that reason / I don’t think that it will happen in next RNS.

Because if you’re gonna get to Production phase of this low cost Test ; you better have end to end care support and treatment in place. All takes time. Ciz in the best place with the Yanks. If you have a potentially Global product that is. So I remain hopeful and patient.

Techton. I’ve just wrote a 2 paragraph explanation re Global Trade routes and relationships and effective treatment and infrastructure. Browser refreshed and got deleted !! It looks like the Americans in control of this and therefore they will dictate the pace upon what speed of progress is made.

All takes time.

If you or anyone else thinks we get to production in next RNS / then we would have to have a Production Start Date / would we not ?

We will know if the Americans need more time re end to end care because they will extend the Clinical trials just to be sure of course. All imo. Let’s see …

If you produce this Test cheaply (That is the goal), then you’re gonna have to have a Bigger plan to deliver effective treatment.

These are just my views. Nothing more. Can read ‘em like a book.

If anyone thinks there will be a production start date in next RNS / then put your name down. Goodluck. That would be quite a bold prediction considering everything we know or think we know so far..

I am saying Radio Silence is good. No pump and dump here. I am also saying the next RNS won’t deliver the end game or indeed any concrete pathway to production (That’s what we want). Now / What is the one thing required in this situation ?

Answer : Patience.

And I absolutely do not foresee announcement re commencement of Production in next RNS. No way.

One thing is certain imo Oapk. Whatever is in the RNS will leave more Questions than Answers. Timelines and Potential will be vague. Alan is not going to Sell the Potential Progress to anyone apart from those whom are Significant Shareholders. The SS will know more than what the RNS reveals and we will be left mulling over what has been revealed. And don’t get me wrong / usually when the CEO is Selling the Benefits to the insignificant Private Investor / you know there could be a problem (Pump and Dump). Radio Silence is just fine by me. He’s revealing as little as possible imo.

Fully agree Countingcards. Good Post.

Why cannot Tesco set Annual Dividend at 6% ? Do this and SP would set new highs. Esp with recent Share Buy Back. 6% is surely a realistic goal ?

Thank you Techtonic. I have changed my mind re commenting for time being as I do not like the Tone / Paranoia on this BB. Some Good Posters nevertheless and I will read up from a distance. GLA.