Member Info for Fadec92

Major applications

The injection of high-pressure pure nitrogen gas has been selected for the following applications to increase oil production:

• Miscible displacement of oil
• Gas cap displacement
• Cycling rich gas reservoirs
• Immiscible displacement of oil
• Pushing carbon dioxide miscible fronts

Miscible displacement of oil

In many deep reservoirs containing light crude, nitrogen achieves multiple contact miscibility with oil, dramatically increasing recovery in the swept zone. Nitrogen has been selected over carbon dioxide for many of these applications.

Gas cap displacement

Nitrogen injection is being used to replace the gas cap over an oil column, allowing immediate production and sale of gas while maintaining the reservoir pressure needed to maximize produc- tion from the oil column.

https://www.airproducts.co.uk/~/media/downloads/data-sheets/E/enhanced-oil-recovery-datasheet.pdf?industryItem=Industries&subIndustryItem=Energy&segment=OilGas-Production&applicationChildItem=OilGas--Offshore&productLevel3=Nitrogen-Generator

Cleaning up in oil and gas – Boosting yields and efficacy with nitrogen

https://www.gasworld.com/nitrogen-cleaning-up-in-oil-and-gas/2011513.article

They shouldn’t say words like high impact, tipping point as looks like they have failed after a length of time, maybe he gets excited when in talks with end users and has good feedback and thinks it’s going to happen and conveys this to us but then no deal leaves him looking silly.

DT is Kansas in a way as you know they wanted to find a cheap source of N2 to facilitate DT, it surprised them the purity and high pressure and the market potential to sell with no processing.

See I said potential because until they are selling to market it is a potential, but surely it does actually make sense that they can sell to market.

I research about kinder Morgan a lot and I think they are trying to emulate their early business model with having a gas that has a technical Benifit to the industry and will need to secure assets and focus on the application to the market, but not only in oil and gas as Kinder but agricultural industry uses as well.

1.Is the N2 gas cheaper to provide to the market by normal industries standards, yes!

2.Is the concept of talking N2 from the ground pure and selling to market feasible as a working model, yes!

If you look at Kinder Morgan they made a business of suppling CO2 to the Permian Basin for Enhanced oil recovery.

3.Is there a need from the market for the use of pure N2, yes!

a.production of fertilizer

https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1290/2004-1290.pdf

b.providing to the oil and gas industry for Enhanced oil recovery and Artificial lifting

3.Is the market near to N2 find!

It’s closer to market ie Hugoton than any CO2 field that Kinder Morgan operates.

https://imgur.com/a/dpnXWLM

See the ROIP (Remaining oil in place) of the light blue Mid-Cont 65.6 BBls which is Kansas,

https://imgur.com/a/EmZ2U7R

Growth of US CO2 EOR and Kinder Morgan pdf

https://imgur.com/a/H0vpbiz

Ive taken my info from this CO2 pdf as N2 has similar properties as both can be processed from air but as Kinder Morgan’s business model shows that drilling wells and extracting CO2 from underground as a working business works!

Highlands N2 well is much closer to Kansas oil and gas fields than any Kinder Morgan CO2 fields and no CO2 gaslines near so that’s why I’m very interested to know the geological size of the Highlands N2 find and if continuous throughout area of Hamilton Kansas and Prowers Colorado as close to boarder.

https://www.netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/CO2_EOR_Primer.pdf

Here is the latest helium outlook from Edison research group February 2019

https://www.edisongroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/HeliumMacroUpdate2019.pdf

The lease package is not finished imo, also even though the geology is the same throughout the area and there’s a pretty good chance that the helium is continuous, would need more work for a major to come in there is a big resource as per CPR ie like Hugoton and Helium prices are predicted to rise with new finds and production not there yet but more advancement is needed imo!

As far as I can see with investing in general all shares are the same, I follow a couple and the way they movements are similar!

If there is a chance to drill 16 new wells in the proven B and C benches then the 4 wells in the unproven A bench on a already producing pad would suffer you would have to disrupt the production again, makes more sense to come back to drill on 15-16 pads when the wells are due for a refrack, that way it would be more efficient on the pad operationally and makes sense!

Could be they wanted same 7.5%, and highlands want a better deal maybe!

Maybe they have a more positive outcome on the lower pads and they extra wells would get in the way operationally, would you consentrate on a Formation that is not as proven as the Niobrara B and C!

The Niobrara A is thinner and are not the original target in Arapaho area!

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/SAR/13985760.html

Two in one day, what’s going on! :/)

Jof must be your internet it works if I click it!

https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair

That’s good news with the Patent allowance, thanks Substp! :/)

Proven to work!

Suspect you know better than a Halliburton’s!

“With the insight and execution of the CALIBR Engineered Flowback service, Halliburton was able to deliver a better well with the highest productivity index of any in the customer’s portfolio. The well continued to flow at higher rates, delaying the necessity for artificial lift. The resultant production gain proved to the client that this field was not marginal and was worth further development.”

https://www.halliburton.com/content/dam/ps/public/ts/contents/Case_Histories/web/calibr-permian.pdf

Ps!! sorry to bring back a part of his post!

D14 said

“Funny though, although the choke has to be opened and to extend the revenue for the wells, has this ever been proved? All taking every word as gospel but do not react to that or there will be loads of posts from many explaining the many items that never happened :)“

A classic case of research and don’t listen to what people post, a quick google of Halliburton’s flowback management would have answered “has this ever been proved” as a negative!

Yes has been proved! :/)

In the first bit Abstract!

https://www.halliburton.com/content/dam/ps/public/ts/contents/Papers_and_Articles/web/URTEC-2461207-MS.pdf

“this process effectively manages drawdown pressure to reduce damage to fracture conductivity and to increase cumulative production.”

Good to here from you too, it’s actually quite refreshing as some would be on anti-depressants listening to their views for too long! Lol...

More news in the pipeline and I’m sure we’ll hear what that is soon and like the sound of the bullmarket, stay focused! ATB!

I’m still here predator, just ticking over doing research living life and not taking notice of the negative crew, just browsing and catched your post!

Looking forward to a lot of news, more wells and maybe more wells again with True assessing the wells flow potential looking for a better long term wells as you would want to preserve them as much as possible makes sense after all with a good return on the production!

Other news on Kansas, crop trial, argon if the right type and a new presentation, and more land up for grabs on other projects in the locker, let’s see! :/)

https://imgur.com/a/Ibt1i5H

Here’s the Production Wellhead Monitoring Equipment Company!

http://www.eagleautomation.com

Yes 9mm is small all to do with reservoir pressures, each well has a different pressure, and would be increasing the sizing gradually as to not displace any sand as for a better long term well as you already know!

Don’t understand imperial so here’s a conversion from inches to millimeters, so can understand that 9mm is conservative, here’s a conversion chart!

23/64 = 9.128mm

https://www.reade.com/reade-resources/reference-educational/reade-reference-chart-chemical-conversion/40-fractions-to-decimals-to-inches-to-mm-millimeters-conversion-chart