Member Info for exetrchief

Set to open FLYBE /Brady/Cyrus Cano of worms, with Branson business dealings laid out , next few days

The point here is simple.
Stobart with Brady and Flybe woith LAffin and COW set out vto defraud investors.

Why did Stobart enter talks with Flybe in FEB 2018, it was to illicit information to take it and use it for a fruadulent act.

Brady and co prove that by statinf in the FEB RNS that they were going into it, with the aim of forming a consortium and using a new entity to (ie) a Con Airways type company.

Once they said there proposal and offer had not met the FLYBE objective, Stobart had managed to put in place, that any other prospective purchaser who came along, they had to be told of and they had as good as first and only call on buying FLYBE.

What transpired from there is simple.
EVERCORE represented FLYBE and were still engaged by Virgin, further more CYRUS CAPITAL are Virgiung biggest shareholder and funder.

Brady and co had everything they needed to walk away and be 100% confident in setting up Con Airways via an OFC set up in Luxemborg and registred in the Caymans.

FLYBE shares if trading on a US Exchange main listing would have been suspened instantly for misleading statements and how they operated in FEB MARCH 2018 and no US Exchange or regulator would ever have allowed a switch of listing.

As to how far EK will go, if any where, my only confidence at this time is with US Regulators and them acting and dragging the UK Government into play for aiding such a fraud and if I was IAG, EZJ, RYA I would be objecting to any subidized routes paid towards by UK Goverment finances.

Stobart have had a decent history, but since Brady arrival , STOBART as been mired in more games and deciet , than most other companys.

STOBART use of an EBT to swing votes at AGM is illegal and HMRC should close it down.

The point here is simple.
Stobart with Brady and Flybe woith LAffin and COW set out vto defraud investors.

Why did Stobart enter talks with Flybe in FEB 2018, it was to illicit information to take it and use it for a fruadulent act.

Brady and co prove that by statinf in the FEB RNS that they were going into it, with the aim of forming a consortium and using a new entity to (ie) a Con Airways type company.

Once they said there proposal and offer had not met the FLYBE objective, Stobart had managed to put in place, that any other prospective purchaser who came along, they had to be told of and they had as good as first and only call on buying FLYBE.

What transpired for there is simple.
EVERCORE represented FLYBE and were still engaged by Virgin, further more CYRUS CAPITAL are Virgiung biggest shareholder and funder.

Brady and co had everything they needed to walk away and be 100% confident in setting up Con Airways via an OFC set up in Luxemborg and registred in the Caymans.

FLYBE shares if trading on a US Exchange main listing would have been suspened instantly for misleading statements and how they operated in FEB MARCH 2018 and no US Exchange or regulator would ever have allowed a switch of listing.

As to how far EK will go, if any where, my only confidence at this time is with US Regulators and them acting and dragging the UK Government into play for aiding such a fraud and if I was IAG, EZJ, RYA I would be objecting to any subidized routes piad twoards by UK Goverment finances.

Stobart have had a decent history, but since Brady arrival , STOBART as been mired in more games and deciet , than most other companys.

STOBART use of an EBT to swing votes at AGM is illegal and HMRC should close it down.

Starance, I hope he does, but reading the documents on his role to investigate when elected, his scope is fery narrow and In my opinion and its one based on experience, Mr EK investigation needs to cover the period from January 2018, as the RNS reports put out by FLYBE, do in no way match those put out by Stobart, and as the two parties involved have put out conflicting RNS reports, one draws the conclusion the deception was set up in FEB/MARCH 2018.

Mr EK investigating something from Nov 14th 2018 will not cover the designed fraud by parties Evercore, Stobart represented by Brady, Cyrus Represented by Lucien Farell, and Branson, all adided and betted by Maitland who are employed by FLYBE under Laffin an the Board of Flybe

Starance, US Regulkators can access anything that is lodged in Connect, be it via any of the partner in the consortium, they have full jurisdiction to access any OFC wether in the Paridse islands or Luxembory and one as to remember Cyrus and Evercore are under the Jurisdiction of SEC, which also covers the FCPA

Laffin does not like oversight, as Elijha would say

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:harWZsXAfVsJ:laffins.net/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-1-ab

https://twitter.com/SimonLaffin/status/1051717428751806465

Good look with your new share promoting of SKIN, just rember to add the T , when your all SKINT from buying into something that as no research or Due Dilligance done on it

TAV, I would be very wary of Hoskins , there position is be monitored with regard to Cyrus holding company DLP Holdings.

They need to play with a straight bat as does EK.

Wonder if fly bmi will be brought from administration?

FLYBE LHR to Jersey courtsey of OFC Jersey
http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/articles/325000/new-heathrow-guernsey-air-link-confirmed

http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/articles/325000/new-heathrow-guernsey-air-link-confirmed

Stobart went on to say

Under Note 2 on Rule 2.8 of the Takeover Code, Stobart Group reserves the right to set the restrictions in Rule 2.8 aside in the following circumstances:

a)Â Â with the agreement of the Board of Flybe;

b)Â Â if a third party announces a firm intention to make an offer for Flybe;

c)Â Â if Flybe announces a "whitewash" proposal (see Note 1 of the Notes on Dispensations from Rule 9) or a reverse takeover (as defined in the Takeover Code); and

d)Â Â if there has been a material change of circumstances (as determined by the Takeover Panel).

In FEB/MARCH OF 2018 TO FLYBE. Was it an Offer or was it Laffin and Evercore, BRADY scam

From Stobart RNS
Further to the announcement made by Stobart Group on 22nd February 2018, Stobart Group and Flybe have been unable to reach agreement on satisfactory terms. The Board of Stobart Group has determined that it is not in its shareholders' best interests to increase its latest proposal for Flybe above the level which was rejected by the Board of Flybe. Given this, Stobart Group confirms that it does not intend to make an offer for Flybe.

Stobart Group and Flybe enjoy a range of shared interests as well as a growing franchise arrangement between the two groups' airlines and it is Stobart Group's intention to continue the collaborative working relationship between both companies.

Paid Monday PM, but if you use HL, expect to be ripped off on payments etc

EK going to hope for a place on the board? Start investigating from Nov 14 th 2018, odd that, considering US Regulator are focusing on period May 2017 onwards, with specifics on Feb 2018 and March 2018 when Brady and COW, Laffin acted to de fraud investors with Evercore

Add a T to that stock , and thats what you will be SKINT.

Wether the dividends are paid once a year or split twice, which is a real pain or 4 times, makes little difference to the growth factor. EZJ going forward have plans for Air Italia .

The SP as risen 30% in ntwo months and could rise another 15/20% in the next two months.

I can not see into the future, or do I ever post a buy or sell rec on any posts.

By the way HIKMA shares went up 90% after there dividend was paid last year, so, one can not draw a conclusion based on one share.

That is your opinion which I respect, my view is based on the fundimenatls, and how EZJ have set everything in place.
By the way, the divi is not a reason to buy or sell days before or afterwards. Growth is my long term aim, but each to there own

Its not about a supposed offer, its about a Crook anbd fraudster called Warwick Brady , acting with Evercore, and Cyrus.

Flybe failed to inform investors that Laffin and engaged in Data theft and given Brady ???

Stobart will finish up with a 8 figure fine from US regulators, enough to send Stobart investors scuttling from cover when the Stobart SP hits 20p

Bloch and Smithy two of the posters who mislead

Cow wages may be high, not as high a crook Brady and his mate Farell at Cyrus , or as high a Justin Oakley at Evercore.

You want high wages for doing sweet FA,, take a lok at what Tony Hayward was paid by Genel Energy to take to stock price from £10 to £ 1.00 an dload it with $800 million of debt, before leaving from Israeli backed Glencore who traded in ISIL oil

If Mr Khon is elected, then its a step forward, but be prepared as SEC will get Brady, Cyrus, Evercore, and Laffin, Branson Virgin .

Wonder what an ex dricetor who joined IAG as told regulators in the USA about Brady, Cyrus, Laffin and Evercore..

Bloch and Smithy two of the rogue crook who frequent LSE share forum

Connect airways , alias Rogues Crooks of Stobart, Flybe, Virgin, Cyrus, Evercore have not brought FLYBE the listed company, todate they have provided finance that was on offer by other parties who wanted to keep the company.

Your problem Smithy is a simple one, and its this, the owners of the Hanger at Exter airport brought are now under investiagtion as well for collusion, but Hey Smithy, while your here, maye be you can explain a simple fact, what are the compitition laws in the UK.

Seems Laffin and Brady dont realize what they did last February. March of 2018 and acting withy nknown rogues and crooks of the consortium known as Con Airways

Apologies for missing the key word NOT out
Its with regret I need to say this, business law does " NOT" overide listing requirements and notifications by FLYBE.

Its with regret I need to say this, business law does overide listing requirements and notifications by FLYBE.

If FLYBE had stated in an RNS, the only epople that could speak with FLYBE back in March 2018 and afterwards were themsleves and they had the right to be the first party to be notified of any interest by another buyer, would that break listing rules and disanvatage shareholders?

Its really time to stop making excuses for this FRUAD and the UK government.

Best advice Woodstock is to start making the point that the UK as no reglaution and survives by screwing people who invest in UL Listed companys on the premium listing or standard, ..I wont get into AIMS, as that is a UK casino and dog raging is better regulated