RE: Email response to RMR19699 Mar 2020 21:41
Post suspension, we've had positive messages but no RNS.
The twit. Representing a big company as PDAQ. The update on the website on the 13th, 2 days after the suspension.
The BOD have always been transparent with regards their intentions and knowing the value of what they have.
In general, all we have is positive clues. however, the phrase with regards resolving a situation, the Hammond twit could all be strategic and deliberate actions to buy time and get a deal brokered. Whatever anyone says, a man of 30+ years experience would not twit a message like that by error. I work for an investment bank and insider trading is a serious matter. You cannot even send an email externally without copying in your line manager. You cannot send an email with attachment without info security and compliance monitoring it. You do a regular online test on insider trading no matter what department you work in. If you don't complete it, you get a message from the big boss, not even your line manager.
You have to declare the shares you own to compliance. You have to inform them 24 hours before you sell your shares. Its serious matter. So i cannot see Hammond making a silly mistake like that. I feel its strategic. to force a move and that is what EUA is dealing with now i think.