Member Info for Ella10

Steve,
Anger - not at all...
There was podcast earlier in the week to reassure shareholders that doesn't appear to tie up with the RNS.
I would like some reassurance of where we are drilling. The options assigned and shares bought last week were apparently done with more knowledge of the first 3 drills than it appears the market currently has - I want that situation rectified.

It doesn't appear that the market is pricing this news at 6p per share....

Expected via RNS TODAY.

Considering what has just occurred on another project I EXPECT updated drill info for the drills completed to be issued via RNS today.

Westlad, Oiltap
I'm curious to hear your views on the sale.

Well I guess there was a very good reason for odour of rat....

Thanks DC,
16% copper doesn't sound too shabby.

Hope your order contains plenty of yellow plasticine :-)

Think of all those poor kids who can't get hold of any plasticine to pass their hours in lockdown. All because everyone is modelling Racecourse. Who manufactures plasticine - is XTR going to cause a spike in their shares...

Cheers,
Good to know my assumptions don't seem too far off.

Teip,
This is the diagram I was using
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/8229M_2-2021-1-25.pdf

Teip,

This is the diagram I was referring to
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/8229M_2-2021-1-25.pdf

CE,
I don't know how it equates to the end of March expectation. Some of my assumtions may be grossly out or maybe we won't get a model bythe end of March time frame.

The latest drill plan shows 9 holes planned. Assuming hole 4 means 10 holes are now required then we have 5 more holes to drill (and assays to receive) in order to get the info to update the model. This is large deep resource so if my understanding is correct, assuming an optimisic 80m a day, and an average of 800m a hole then once hole 5 is finished we would have 50 more days of drilling to get the cores to complete a model. This does not account for assay times for the last hole or updating the model. The remaining holes may not need to be as deep but I'm not sure any of them will be much less than 700m. I assume if we are lucky with the targets we may not need 10 holes to get to a reasonable model. This is sort of good news as the bigger the resource is the longer the drilling progam. However if my assumptions are anywhere near correct we will be lucky to get an updated model by the end of April.

Would be much appreciated.

too much excitement from the drilling of potential monsters.

You're full of ....

The geos and drill crew are that good that they've probably created their own wee assay lab( but have forgotten to mention this to CB...).

He mentioned a cube and 1000 × 1000 ×1000 but I think that went along with a phrase along the lines of 'for simplicity'. He did later say it wasn't a cube. The strike length is not determined directly from mineralisation in the holes.

It seems yesterday's interview was required. Looking good.