RE: can anyone tell me the USP of FDBK?31 Dec 2017 21:15
USP - TexRAD can detect, measure and analyse tumour complexity and textures beyond the level of that available to the naked eye. This, in turn, gives TexRAD the ability to add new imaging biomarkers for heterogeneity to add to the value to existing markers of tumour size, density and perfusion.
All of this would provide benefits to individual patient care of course but you seem to think (see your Advfn posts) that radiologists overall are a breed of person that won't bother learning how to become familiar with new fangled software and will simply ignore the possibilities this software opens up for them.
________________
One of your quotes from the other side follows.
"The radiologists want the easy life, to go in report the scan and go home,
I train radiologists to use reporting workstations , I’ve shown hundreds advanced applications like TexRad. After I leave most revert back to what they have done for years . Put the images on the screen and report what they see through a dictaphone."
_________________
Not sure how that would tie in to the doctors' Hippocratic oath nor where it would leave the hospitals should patients wish to sue for neglect of duty of care. Remember, TexRAD can reveal more than a radiologist can see by eye and you think the radiologist will choose to ignore that in favour of bunking off a bit earlier.
Still I'm sure you can provide us shareholders with a reasonable explanation as to how radiologists and doctors square their duty of patient care with their anticipated willful refusal to deal with new technology.
Anyway, that's all you're getting from me for now, I'm running a fever and you've completely put me off going to see a medical professional as I don't want them casting their chicken bones to see whether I'm going to survive the next few days or not.