RE: If Samsung lose and appeal14 Dec 2021 11:25
So even if one patent is found to be breached by May 2022, Samsung needs to make a deal with Nano both for a % of past excess profits on the TVs and a % royalty going forward. That's what I'm holding out for. But even if the royalty were 5%, that would imply a cash injection of almost £1bn plus future income of ~£150m a year (a guesstimate). That surely equates to share price 30x or 50x the current level?
It seems strange to me that the SP is so low given the probability of breach of a patent being found. On the other hand, a law firm was willing to fight it for no win no fee, and it's biggest endorsement is Hargreaves Lansdown as a major shareholder.