RE: Q&A tonight 7am22 Feb 2024 12:56
Q: Given the postcode of the asset & the surrounding majors, IGO, Belle Vue, BHP & Liontown. Have the company ever been approached by the likes of Belle Vue for a similar JV to the LTR one but in respect of the gold?
If not, and we do get some nice gold intersects, would the company be open to a similar deal to the LTR JV retaining a %age of the gold & an upfront cash payment?
Lastly, is this even something that could work, having LTR mine for lithium & BGO mine for gold?
A: I'll let Mark comment on the JV but in terms of gold and lithium assets in the same licence it would be a question of proximity and infrastructure. As long as the two orebodies and mine footprints wouldn't overlap then it would be OK.
Q: I understand that there could be water on the MILA license area and that this could be of economic interest to LTR. Could you tell us more about this?
A: Liontown are particularly excited about the water which they need for production and hope shortly to start drilling on the Coffey permissions which will provide more knowledge on the area for us
Q: How can Mila potentially monetise their water asset?
A: water quality in the MILA KV licence appears better for processing for LTR. It is less saline and therefore would have significant savings in terms of processing for them. The access to this water is within Mila's licence and therefore they would need to acquire it for access.
Q: Why do you think the shareprice is currently only reflecting £1m -£1.5m for the asset with JV deal attached? What steps do you plan on taking to help close the value disconnect between current value and projected fair value? For example have you thought about director buys or sourcing strategic Investors to restore investor confidence?
A: We have been waiting for Liontown to commence before starting marketing as we didn’t want to make promises in this difficult Lithium environment . Tonight is the start of a promotion campaign which we will now continue with as the work progress.
Q: Liontown were offered a $4.2bn takeover, albeit I think this was when lithium prices were much higher. I understand that their primary asset is their Kathleen Valley lithium resource. How does the size of their license area compare to MILA’s? There is clearly a bit of a value disconnect between the 2 companies 😂. I am trying to understand whether the MILA license area has the potential to contain a similar amount of natural resources as the Liontown license area, albeit clearly Mila are light years behind in terms of proving up and developing!
A: An extension to the existing LTR mineralisation is more likely. In terms of area it is possible for a similar sized orebody to occur in the Mila licence but the realistic opportunity is for a significant tonnage addition to their resource towards greater depth. LTR have a high grade orebody and it is a tier one project so any resource expansion within the Mila licence would still represent a great return.