Member Info for dunderhead

Agree Andrew - simple update RNS on testing all that was required - very green management - thought better. IMHO

Last post as I'm on holiday, no problem for them to confirm that testing went as planned and commercial production expected mid January as previously guided however, they should RNS if testing and clear up didn't go to plan and or mid January start up of gas unlikely. When (or only if hopefully!) that information becomes apparent to them (of course, LOL) is open to "interpretations". I do not personally think "Southwark" doesn't "work" but certainly communications have to improve in current market environment and I thought RN appreciated this need.
All IMHO, DYOR and no advice intended!!

Lol its probably the "shorters" or the "mms" fault not the constant under performance of the "management" here of course.
I thought Newall understood the mechanisms of the "new" trading market and the need to feed constant good news RNS because if not, the speculators are going to tear the share price down considering the crap dished up here to date.
What a shame. All IMHO, DYOR of course.

Probably more likely going back to previous "form".
Newall looked like he had learned from Bozos previous communications mistakes.
Why haven't they bothered to RNS about test results?
Simple notification everything went well and looking forward to commercial production starting as previously guided.
Starting to be like muppet central again but lets be clear, with the pooh BS / share ownership structure here I'd expect pretty quick changes if Southwark doesn't perform as expected?!
As ever all IMHO and Dyor!!

Interested to hear if it is returning Spa - on holiday at moment and don't have much access at all to laptop. Bloody hope it is finished - as if not timelines starting to look very stretched again unless simply on stand-by for "emergency work"?!! IMHO, DYOR.

Yes from memory they were net figures - were they not?

Spa, agree 100000%

Superhuman. No genuinely not at the moment as am already geared enough for TXP. As I say may buy some more when drill bit is in ground and genuinely wish all holders well who average down at these prices. I still think PB can happily miss more targets again but if not already hold 1mm plus here.
All IMHO, dyor.

Absolutely, why invest with that tit in charge?
He's not achieved any timelines at all and done the exact opposite of what he voluntarily promised. I ain't buying a a thing again until until the bit is in ground.
Total fing twat.
All IMHO, dyor.

Thanks SNl.

Fully concur.

Who cares you don't care David? Honestly you really come across like an idiot with your posts, are you trying to be ironic?
SpaMarda/ Sailor NL are you guys still with "us"?
Any operations viewpoints?
Best of luck all.

To be honest not taking WoW into account it has way passed the half-way mark for the budgeted two wells combined has it not (don't know how much WoW was in those figures either?)- so it was probably a "safe assumption" the job was completed - I think a post by some chap on here earlier in week - with a "certainty" about it - that probably set the ball rolling!! Who knows? We certainly will in the next two weeks - so here's hoping we don't see too much more share price weakness in the interim!!
Best of luck all.
As ever all IMHO, DYOR.

It didn't take big volumes "before" - I think "possibly" now just because everyone fairly assumed that the stim etc had been completed which probably was in line with budgeted timelines - now we find the vessel going back to site this evening - so maybe people upset about the job not being completed and costing more and / or assuming an issue arising when they thought the job completed and the vessel having to go back? There's going to be a lot of nervous people out there because if Southwark f's up then God knows what will happen, lol!!
All IMHO and DYOR.

Or what it looks like? Who knows with the "luck" here? IMHO, DYOR

W69 - I also don't know too much about the fracc stim work these vessels do OR THE SPECIFIC PROG HERE - as it was always done "on rig" when I was "around". However I'd have thought the vessel was only there to supply power and materials for the work but didn't have to be on-site all the time? Also, when it was done "on rig - whether drilling or work-over" they weren't always "active" on deck, whilst the job was being done, so to speak - hence does the vessel have to be on-site all the time? It also seemed to be a lot lot faster when "on-rig", lol!!
I know there are (ex?)-drillers who post on here so could they clarify exactly the type of processes involved?
As ever all IMHO, DYOR.

hey Alligator absolutely hear what you are saying. At the moment this Rupert guys seems great, so we have to give him the benefit of the doubt? I am still nervous of the fact that he clarified 22-28MCF/day which implies to me much better current field production than prior to maintenance works - and if this isn't the case would be disappointed and would personally reduce trust in this so far - well performing management team - all IMHO, DYOR.

Ah this is taking significantly longer than originally budgeted time then?
Again the issue with doing most of your project work during the winter - hopefully the new operations guy may be able to schedule a little better in the future?
As ever all IMO, DYOR!!

Blimey that's a bit of a surprise?
Considering Southwark about to start, gas prices for the foreseeable likely to be very high I'd have a higher price forecast than 20p??!! IMHO, DYOR.

I've finally listened to the interview and like the chap and what was spoken.
Without wishing to sound ramptastic - you do get the feeling it is like a coiled spring here?
All IMHO and DYOR of course!!