Oliver Hasler, executive chairman of PYX Resources, presents 1H24 Results. Watch the interview here.
Nibj- I think nobody wanted to pay āfair priceā this last 13years for a greenfield project(to much risk-2-premium), So weāre going brownfield(small scale), this will help us achieve a āfairer priceā. There will be dilution to achieve this, and so long as it adds value, I personally donāt have any issues. I think we will then be brought out as a small scale producer(could be the whole project, or just our stake).
Why now- because the iron ore market pressures/price/co2/high grade= GAME ON.
Also, the restructuring of the company last year makes this cleaner for Glencore to increase their holding without being in direst control(although they still have control behind the curtain).
This is a very complex conversation to have, and there are so many variables.
In summary-
1-we will see dilution next year to fund initial development/Glencore will part-fund and increase their stake in doing so.
2-A āmoneyāpartner will be brought in.
3- We will get bought out 2025 onwards by a major/maybe Glencore, maybe a major buys Glencore out?( I donāt care, as long as I get Ā£2+)
Iām expecting Ā£500m-1bn market cap 2024, Ā£3bn+ 2025 onwards, equating to share price is dependent on dilution, but expecting Ā£1 p/s 2024/Ā£3+ 2025 onwards.
Of course thereās still a possibility all this noise is merely a rue to force a buyout at a āfairā price.
It will all become clearer as soon as next week(with any luck)!
AIMO.
Gla.
A lot of thought provoking funding scenarios being suggested.
Could I suggest perhaps a slightly different scenario where Glencore fund āourā portion through underwriting issuance of new shares,(increasing their holding(and enabling them to appoint a further rep to the board(the new CEO). The rest of the funding(majority) coming through a loan, to get us into initial ā small scaleā production.
Glencore might be our āpreferred strategic partnerā?
Obviously āthe bankā we loan the monies from will by virtue become a vested interest/strategic partner(Chinese/pif?), with options on interest being paid through equity.
Occam's razor anyone?
Gla.
Letās be honest, ātheyā almost lost control of the share price prior to the announcement of the shard (1st tranche) placement, and I believe the share price would have began that same out of controlā trajectory today, with this Amazing announcement(donāt underestimate the significance of todayās RNS), if not for announcing along side the placement of the 2nd tranche.
I suppose it all wonāt make much of a difference in the long runā¦weāre now most certainly on the way to being developed l, and a market cap a hell of a lot higher than todays.
AIMO.
Gla
Https://www.mining.com/iron-ore-price-up-as-hopes-of-china-stimulus-resurface/
Mm- thanks for this,
Guess it will all be in any āDealā thatās struck.
Iāve always put the poor SP down to the fact that any proposed buyer would be put off by not having the say on where the end product would be shipped.
That and the āinconvenienceā of having to deal with Glencore, on Glencores termsā¦
Your input may make me reconsider thisā¦although there has to be a reasonable explanation for why the SP is still in the flipping single digits?..any reasoning et all?
MM- youād be better off āpagingā Glencore PLC, last I checked they have āexclusive offtakeā of any ore that gets processed out of ZANAGA..
It will be their call on where the ore gets shipped.
Gla.
Perhaps āto clear the decksā prior to the AGM on Tuesday?
Still outstanding-
1) costings update.
2) loan repayment/restructuring.
3) Shard placing update(1st/2nd/3rd tranche)
4) updated NPV?
5)Also potential MOUās(port/hydro/preferred partners.
Otherwise a whole load of time is going to be spent addressing questions around the above at the AGM.
On a side note, wouldnāt it be lovely for AT to do a Q+A webinar, or at least a proactive investor update post AGM.
Gla.
Bonker- have a peek at Zioc, been long in the tooth, but think weāre in the end game there, sort of like Mka(I also hold a few there).
As for here, would love to see a continuation of the turnaround, Iāve got a little too deep!!(averaging 15.5p).
Gla
Much has been made of the fact that Zioc is a ābinary betā, in essence whether it does, or does not not get developed.
All research & indeed our boards actions(RNSās) lead me to conclude we are no longer binary, not 100% going to be developed.
The only outstanding variables are
1) timeline(4 months countdown)
2) how far we PIās get carried along, before we get thrown off the train/and how much āgoldā our faces get stuffed with!
On a side note MMās private(he would like to think) alternative board(READ=Universe) becomes more toxic by the day.
Very sad state of affairs when we lose our common decency & respect for each other, and resort to childlike name calling.
Thanks to all here for keeping it civil.
Gla respectful holders/posters.
Ex-thanks.
I do see this news as relevant, it cuts the potential distance of āThe slurry pipeā considerably, so as to link to the rail infrastructure, that in turn could haul āourā beautiful high grade ore to port,
Further reducing capex.
Gla.