Member Info for dougb189

"..$279.5m to be exact!.."

so only a wee bit more ambitious than the 2016

'guaranteed sales of $5.2M with our exclusive deal with Second Chance..'

Lol, but I can't wait for CTAG Season 3.

Yup.. there’s a bucketful of sand,

Hey.. there’s my heed disappearing into it

lol & I’ll wait till Amit comes out with the Season 3 episodes.

March 22, 2024

It has come to our attention that the notifications intended for shareholders have not been issued as planned, due to guidance received from the paying agent.

This process has been ongoing for some time and may persist into the following weeks.

THE LICENSING FEES HAVE BEEN DEPOSITED WITH CIBC BANK, LOCATED IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

We will provide further updates to shareholders by the end of the week, concluding on March 29, 2024.

We acknowledge and sympathise with shareholders’ frustrations regarding the delays experienced.

========

Which having now been edited to remove the bank account details will then likely see Amit’s next editorial masterpiece then remove all updates referring to… updates ?!

eg:

March 22, 2024

It has come to our attention that the notifications intended for shareholders have not been issued as planned, due to guidance received from the paying agent.

This process has been ongoing for some time and may persist.

‘hearsay’ is a misnomer, when every single one of the aforementioned notices highlighted Amit Ben Haim’s recklessness with the truth as to when “the payment drops”,

Can hardly then be hearsay, when all the circumstantial evidence of not meeting a single payment date, then has Amit Ben Haim’s fingerprints all over it.

‘Can you imagine, another 3 weeks have passed, and he rolls out more delays, then you have to say it's BS.’

He now only seems to correlate his updates with the feedback seen on media platforms, so yes, fully expecting another ‘distribution proceedings have begun’ aka another ‘your cheques are in the post’ by the end of the month.

Most investors had already moved on from the Ctag series 1 episodes that were all centred on the Onitor & which was then deleted from the UK market listings.

Some at that time then persevered in seeking claims of fraud whilst the rest of us had indeed wrote off the Onitor.

Fast forward 3 years to December 2021 & several Pi’s were then awoken to the Ctag series two episodes with a ‘deal having been reached’ centred on SaaP & DaaP.

Then in 2022, notice of publicised ‘deals for Ctag commodities for $275M’ which then brought all the players back to the table.

‘If you don’t think it’ll pay, just move on and forget about it.’

So that then appears to be a core tenet of Wokiestan fundamentalist policies ? ie. anyone that disagrees with ‘us’ are to remain silent and then if our philosophical thinking pr lack of , is then found to be incorrect, we can ‘simply forget about it.. just write it off’.

Which some would argue is the most cowardly commitment of all.

Less of the negative vibes with those ‘please stop goading’ as the reality can often be far removed ; the ‘goading’ is likely centred on a targeted audience who don’t post their notices on this bb. And it is then just purely coincidental that some external notices get promulgated.

Thank you Helx, Ive just caught up with your ‘evidence’.

It is appreciated.

Im’ still though extremely sceptical on Amit’s abilities, as per the catalogue of improprieties that i then ‘evidenced’.

Fingers crossed that your faith “payout to arrive very shortly” then gets rewarded.

Impulse Dynamics was co-founded by Shlomo Ben Haim and Lewis Pell. As per Shlomo’s wiki- bio.

Care to provide evidence where it then states that Amit Ben Haim has an input on this ?

The strongest evidence as ever with ABH is again somewhat lacking. & the evidence, the available body of facts, is then what ?

So okay, you are suggesting those previous consultancies inclusive of the latest, SB Corporate Finance Partners Ltd, are then deemed sufficient evidence of entrepreneurial achievement ?

With brother Shlomo being a Tier 1 status entrepreneur, an A-lister in the business world, as evidenced by his Wiki bio :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shlomo_Ben-Haim

& its single reference to their joint collaboration on Bio-Sense, which is now deleted from Amit’s only available bio, better summarised as an entrepreneurial Tier non-existent, as per cloudtag.com

A bio nonetheless that can be found on company check where it shows 8 resigned directorship's (many in partnership with Sabine Ben-Haim) & of 5 dissolved directorships.

The only pertinent evidence then being that less than gratifying reference to Amit on Shlomo’s wiki bio.

The counter argument is flawless in its rationale, it simply takes into account ; the website statements & Amit’s past record.

More specifically, the 100% total lack of any verifiable substantiation supportive to the validity of any of the claims made on the website statements in addition to the 100% total lack of accomplishment for any website statement that is then centred on proposed actions &/or their targeted dates.

More specifically, Amit’s past record as a proven bad actor, as highlighted by the Judge & as shown by the FCA approved NOMAD’s refusal to allow him a continued UK market listing.

In addition to Amit’s hazy past record which now sees any reference to his alleged previous single successful enterprise done in collaboration with Shlomo, now being deleted from his bio.

Is more pitiful than frightening. Obviously this is then just an opinion.. Reasons and evidential justification ? & allow me to explain :

She had again re-contacted me 8 weeks ago (copy & pasted onto her yesterday’s deleted thread) after a peaceful hiatus of 3 years and it was simply a “sigh” that i then let out. Her arguments as highlighted per 21:41 have always been incoherent. Mixed with her regular dyslexic inputs these then created a very tiresome effect, where it regularly takes time and effort to try & decipher her posts. IMO then and still is now, she was best ignored.

Her opening message 8 weeks ago was highlighting her new bb ID & of ‘a need for a new platform to air her story’.

Her 2nd message was then two weeks later to enquire why i had gone silent. This was the effect her previous history of incoherent posts had on me.

Pitiful indeed was the woman whose family had lost significantly due to their belief in ABH and at 1st i thought ‘quite plucky’ looking after her family interests. But after her performance (or lack of) it soon became apparent that her arguments were no longer welcomed by those seeking any sort of resolution to the ongoing ABH charades.

Pitiful is the woman who then started to troll my posts when she was politely first told that her own posts were illogical.

Pitiful is the woman who then opened yesterday’s thread which was entirely centred on trying to flame me.

I’m an auld fashioned guy and my focus is on ABH so i don’t take any prisoners. I simply gave her both blasts of the barrel, naming & shaming her, such that she then removed the thread that she had created. No apologies for the lack of remorse in calling out pitiful.

There is a time for balanced perspective and then eventually there is a time for totally focused actions. Hopefully Admin will now delete this thread such that we can all wait quietly for the next instalment of ‘your cheques are in the post’.

Hopefully Helx can indeed enlighten and give some rationale behind his magnanimous thinking towards ABH’s recent endeavours.

As it currently looks, there were what, 5 missed dates each being advertised as target dates for payments and then subsequently all were missed [$/£ conversions, etc]

With the alleged ‘apology’ then arriving in the same notice as the blame for delay being courtesy of a miscalculation from a UK broker ? Again conveniently, very magnanimous!

Would be interesting to hear something more substantial than ‘i feel it in my water’.

So, it looks like another thread is about to depart,

courtesy of the open-minded, balanced, humble folk.

Lol.

of all the foolish statements aired today, that surely takes the biscuit ?

‘..humble folk trying to do their best..’

============

trombone. @. neilgollygosh. apr 26

#ctag hey schlomo ben haim, what's it like having a ****** for a brother. absolute ****** and your family name getting dragged through the **** too

=========

lol but guessing there ain’t going to be much left of that ‘humble’ message..

“I happen to think the narrative that he's told us in consequent updates from the time rings true..”

Flawless in its total lack of rationale.

Proven by the judge as being reckless with the truth, proven by the multiple notices as also being reckless with the truth, But…. hey !

‘I now feel it in my bones that ABH has turned the corner..’

Interesting perspective Hex.

It is perhaps relevant to what is now occurring Antha:

There’s very clear history of reneging on owed accounts.

The probability currently exists that are funds held on escrow or with the agent (slightly higher than 50% imv).

Most sane peeps are all asking why therefore the recurring blatant excuses.

The finger again points at ABH’s mind-set.

(rather hoping that Shlomo may have said a word or two)

Lol, but just a wee bit excited to see what Friday pm’s notice centred on ‘your cheques are in the post’ will now be.. ?!

“agent’s engineers will commence this evening with opening the portal that will allow all Pi’s to receive payments on an equal footing within 14 working days..” ??

Lol but really fail to understand why todays peeps find it so difficult to call a spade a spade. Thankfully the judge had no such qualms.

Case Number : 2207514/2017

5. The claimant chased the payment and received reassurances from the company that they were doing their best to pay. // .He was not told about the time limit.

6. ….

7. As a result of chasing the respondent the claimant received email from the Mr Ben-Haim on 1 August and saying “your payment has been processed and will be with you shortly”. This turned out not to be true.

Signed.

Employment Judge Wade on 22 January 2018.

=====

So….A fairly consistent pattern then of “your cheque is in the post” ??!

(Presumably you meant) post ‘..not contacted or not paid anyone..’

which then relies on an alleged deposit which may or may not be held by an agent or held in a bank in Chicago and whose only existence has then been supported by the many Ctag notices, which have then been consistently proven to be reckless with the truth.

Consider that in both payments, the funds have been released by the clients.

The SaaP has cleared escrow & is allegedly sitting with the agent & the DaaP “had” been cleared for payment ‘’by end of week 16th October [2023]’’.

And it was NOT the client but ABH who then opted to delay, allegedly for extra %.

That these funds had allegedly been cleared, means there is no sitting requirement for NDA’s pertaining to the clients previous requests.

So over $275M has been spent and yet to date there is not one single peep of acknowledgment, not one single listing anywhere, not one mention that these 2 clients had then purchased 0.25 of a Billion $’s worth of commodities ?