Member Info for DJB67

No, NHS Scotland and NHS England are funding the trials, not shareholders. Once again, you state misinformation. Please get your facts right.

Is that the best you’ve got! You can’t comment with anything else because you know my statement is correct!

Yet more misinformation based on your lack of knowledge.

It’s not that they ’can’t breakthrough’ as you state but that the trials haven’t started yet. And they haven’t started yet because the company together with the researchers are preparing all the necessary documentation that is required for Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials. But of course you wouldn’t know that because you haven’t researched the company or made sure you have the latest information.

There you go again. You just can stop can you! I thought we’d put this to bed but yet again you choose to call them crooks but you’ve already stated you have no evidence to support your assertion, so it is a baseless and defamatory comment.

I will continue to challenge every statement of misinformation you make.

Thanks for confirming that you have no evidence that this is a lifestyle company, is trying to defraud investors, the board are crooks and that your views are purely based on a previous experience with other companies.

And thanks also for confirming you are no longer a shareholder.

That puts all that to bed, and we can all now move on and ignore all future posts from you.

I have challenged you because I have invested hard earned money because I believe there is a good chance of it returning a good profit, and that is after a lot of research.

I’m not prepared to let people such as you undermine my investment by posting misinformation, baseless comments and borderline defamatory statements.

You have repeatedly stated that this is a lifestyle company, suggested the CEO and Directors are defrauding shareholders by living off fund raises and that the board are crooks. Whenever I’ve asked you to provide evidence for any of this you can’t. That is why I challenge you. If you had evidence for any of this then people, including me, would listen. So I ask you again, provide the evidence for your statements or stop making them.

And to your point you bought at three times this price, well I did as well. In fact my first purchase was 4 years ago at 1.425. I’ve continued to add and bought as low as 0.3 and at all points in between. I have an average of 0.5p and am more than happy with that. I know the reasons for the change in share price because I have taken the time understand the company. I communicate with Jeremy and Melissa regularly, I read their RNS and presentation, I listen to their comms and importantly I ask them lots of questions. I always get a prompt and thorough response.

I’ve asked if you do the same, but you’ve never answered that so I assume you don’t. Maybe you should.

You never actually answer a question. So troll or trader trying to get in cheap? How about just being open with people instead of just criticising others. But you won me do that because it isn’t your style is it. You thrive on criticising: first the board of a company and then other people posting.

And I think you need to look at my posts again. I rarely post links, and don’t think I’ve ever said this is going to explode. I usually posts facts about recent updates, RNS or similar and also I do challenge anyone who deliberately posts misinformrion. So whilst you may have time to post, how about to stop posting sh*t.

Haha! You make me laugh. You say I spend a lot of time here but look at our respective stats. I’ve been on LSE 5 years and made just over 200 posts, that’s approx 40 posts a year, so less than 1 per week average. Under your current user name you’ve made nearly 1600 posts in 15 months so 24 per week! Looks to me like you are obsessed. And your posting pattern is the same on every company on which you comment, always criticising the board and tying to put off other investors. So are you just a troll trying to disrupt each board or are you deliberately taking down each share to buy in. I can’t make my mind up but either way you should be called out by genuine investors so everyone can see you for what you are.

Not at all. I’m quite happy with my investment. Just got better things to do with my time.

I’ll take that as a no then. Like I said, no balls!

So are you going to contact Melissa? Are you going to ask her questions about the company? Are you going to challenge her and ask her if she is funding her lifestyle from shareholder funds? No, of course you aren’t because you’ll make a fool of yourself (oh yeah, and no balls!)

Ah Norfolk is back. I wondered how long it would be before you started spouting the same old garbage! And yes, Melissa did come in here (approx 18 months ago), as a verified user under her own name. But you aren’t interested in hearing that because you are so deluded in thinking Darren (60601971) and I are board members. Muppet!

And, if you have so many good ideas and have issues with the company have you ever contacted them? So you ever ask questions on The Hub or have you even tried emailing Melissa or Jeremy?

Both are extremely responsive no matter how you contact them. I’m sure they’d love to hear your thoughts and ideas. But hang on, you won’t do any of that because you haven’t got the balls. You are afraid of showing yourself to be the fool that you are.

Your version of clinical trials would not pass the test for a drug that the company want to make available on the NHS and in the USA.

The difference here is that big pharma will want in, and not want to quash. Look out for the bug out once the clinical trials have provide the efficacy of the MRX medications.

And yes, another raise will be in the way. That is how small developing companies grow!

Oh, and there you go again accusing us of being Directors and members of the board! You are a complete and utter loser! Same as Darren, I’m just a regular retail investor trying make a few quid.

Melissa Sturgess, the actual CEO, came into this board and posted several times. She could have added real value, but all she got was abuse, so unsurprisingly she didn’t bother coming back.

Salaries of Directors are not the only expense so looking at cash burn does not tell you how much the directors are being paid. Cash burn will also include MRX manufacturing expenses, mouse heart trial, exchange listing expenses, Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic trial, employee costs, marketing, trade and conference expenses, Advisor charges, etc etc. So I ask again, show me where the Directors are taking money out of the business to fund their lifestyle and also tell me what their salaries are. If you have no proof or evidence of the directors taking money out of the business then I suggest you stop making the assertion before one of them has you in court for defamation.

Your idea of a clinical trial is woefully inadequate. You really think any serious national or private health organisation in the UK or overseas would take a drug for widespread use with so little testing. You need to get real!

And as for the products you list most would be considered consumer grade health supplements, and that is not the game Ananda is in. Many have gone down that route before and failed. Just look at the debris in the road of small cannabis companies such as Love Hemp and countless others. No thanks!

Is that the best you’ve got? You’ve clearly got no evidence otherwise you would provide examples or evidence.

So, when you do have evidence present it and maybe someone might take notice. Until then we’ll all continue to take your assertions as complete made up garbage.

Where is your evidence that their lifestyle is funded by Ananda?

More likely it’s funded by the successful companies Charles has been involved in including Clarity Pharma. At one point he had over 18m shares and has gradually been selling down. In 2023 it was reported he sold over $5m Aus and he had already sold some before and after that.

Do you know what salaries they are taking from Ananda?If you do, tell me where I can find the information.

Don’t you think selling a product is what all this is leading to? They can only sell a product once it’s been proven and that is what the trials are intended to do. If you think they can sell a product now, what do you think that should be?

How do you see that they are lining their own pockets? Give examples of where this has happened.

We know Charles has invested £9m, and yes he has received shares in return, but he only gets that money back if Ananda delivers on it’s plans and starts to make money or is bought out.

Super - If you are so well researched and know so much about the industry why did you invest in Ananda knowing they wouldn’t be able to follow your desired path? You clearly don’t like the way pharma companies operate, so given that, why invest? It doesn’t make sense.