RE: realbull9 Oct 2018 17:15
Don't you think its then unfair to attack their estimations in the way you have. For one they never say this is set in stone for the MTU, they are going off what they were told at a site visit that 'could' be attainable. so they are putting the same trust from MM's answer to their original trust in investing in the company in the first place. I just think its so petty that people are hellbent on proving these people wrong, just cause they had some more in depth discussions at a site visit and have come up with the numbers. they still refer to the RNS, but to them a site visit is more recent and they actually had a feel of the place and absorbed in the potential. speculation is fine as it keeps these BB active. rather than just nothing between the RNS. I love the back and forth but when it gets so bitter it ruins it.