This is a pure punt until the DOJ case is resolved one way or another. Anyone who says otherwise is full of sh&t. The current share price prices in the second worse outcome of some sort of settlement although (although in my opinion heavily discounted for that scenario). If priced to reflect a guilty verdict and fine anywhere near what the DOJ are seeking then the shares would be trading in single digits. If the DOJ either settle for a sum well within the current cash reserves or do not win the case then the share price will be multiples of the current price.
I need to get a job at an AIM company. Pay myself hundreds of thousands of pounds per annum, deliver f@&k all, run the company into the ground and then move on to the next one.
The Oilex gravy train just keeps on chugging along. Choo choo.
Of course not. It’s only the delusional, sad, conspiracy theory individuals who, given the amount of time and number of posts, don’t have anything else in their life that believe that.
It is less that the ones who constantly pull price rises out their arse/give a running commentary on every trade price paid/say “Boom” or the all time LSE classic “I wouldn’t want to be out of this over the weekend “ are insecure and more that they are delusional and unwilling to accept the current facts and position so need to post utter drivel to reinforce their position that it’ll all work out in the end. Just look at the PET board. There are loads of posters who are still clutching at the straw that an alleged billionaire (of whom there is scant information available and that what is paints him in a very poor light and does not support the assertion of his alleged billionaire status) has just forgotten to transfer what to him would be pocket change (assuming he really is a billionaire) sum of money to the company despite no word from him weeks later.
It’s the internet Fallingknife1. The innovation that has given voice to people that otherwise would be ignored for the utter pish they spout (some constantly). Thankfully there is the option to filter and block the fuds. I’m surprised you are surprised at the comments posted on this site given your volume of posts.
And you could have at least attempted to disguise your other account by choosing a username that wasn’t your existing username just with the 288 knocked off and a s added.
Roger Tamraz worth $70 billion - You are having a laugh10 Jan 2020 18:54
Where is your evidence of his wealth? For someone that wealthy why is their virtually no reference to him (other than to questionable dealings - Google the CIA memo on him) on the internet?
Anyone invested here who isn’t hearing alarm bells is at best naive and at worst not very intelligent.
I reported several of their posts on various boards yesterday and today. I think they must believe they can actually drive people not already invested to invest and therefore increase the share price. Like a few people who read LSE or their Twatter feed buying makes any difference. Idiot.