Member Info for Devilbhoy

Well something is definitely happening as the board is full of green boxes and new posters who are suddenly experts spouting ****e.

This f&@king share. Nothing can get it moving.

I should have guessed why all of a sudden this board was full of green boxes (although it’s impossible to say definitively given the number of people I have filtered).

Why the need to post a copy of text that is available by reading the RNS?

Well if it is all over the internet then it must be true as nothing false is ever on the internet.

Amazing how they all come out the woodwork as soon as something occurs that provides the opportunity for price volatility.

Honestopinion - I am going to take your advice.

“ ps. If you think someone is a de-ramper, filter him/her out. Why do you spend your energy on dealing with negative people.”

“ This RNS is a positive one for any investor with an outlook longer than a few weeks.”

That pretty much sums up the LSE boards and all like them. Investors don’t make decisions based on weeks. You are not an investor. You are a gambler.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-55143213

Perhaps if the government could pull its head out its ass it would stop p!ssing away tax payer money on crap PPE from third world countries and buy British manufactured goods.

It didn’t say that at all. There was a mention of the 25% drop followed the RNS at the bottom of a daily market report that just happened to discuss some shares that may recover in 2021.

It didn’t say that at all. There was a mention of the 25% drop followed the RNS at the bottom of a daily market report that just happened to discuss some shares that may recover in 2021.

Yes dickpuller. I don’t know why those writing RNSs aren’t making sure they use language that will appease an irrelevant bunch of whiney little *****es on a bulletin board who want their porridge just right; not too hot, not too cold.

There was nothing negative about how the RNS was written. It was matter of fact. That the fuds on boards like this overreact to a couple of weeks delay speaks to the fact they are either fn idiots who spend their day posting on boards because they have nothing else to do, that they are day traders or that they are just stupid and are unhappy that they aren’t seeing 100% returns in days.

Thanks Arthur. I wish more posters who are not invested and therefore should have better things to do with their lives than endlessly posting about a share they do not own would leave us to it.

littletrader - Why are you posting if you have no financial interest in the share?

Seriously? What fn age are you? Get a life.

And Jen1800. You’re a complete twat too. Find something productive to do with your life instead of making irrelevant glib statements on a board.

Both filtered.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54974373

What planet do you live on earth70000? Either he was being facetious or he is a fn idiot. Either way, you are an idiot for treating that post as if it is serious.

Read the part where I said assuming minimal operating expenses. It was clearly a high level approximate calculation. So don’t be a fud.

I also don’t understand those saying that this mask has a limited demand shelf life. Aside from masks being a way of life in lots of Asian countries (including the single largest country in the world that alone makes up almost 20% of the world’s population) long before this pandemic I would venture to say not everyone will stop wearing masks once this is under control.

Add in that there markets like medical use where this technology will still be preferable to standard disposable masks long after this pandemic has gotten under control, the open question around vaccine efficacy and covid 19 becoming endemic then I think there is a big market opportunity.