The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
And consolidation doesn’t “get the share price up” in anyway other than reflecting the consolidation (in my experience the adjusted share price actually decreases) and it also doesn’t attract more “bucket shops”. Art has successfully proven that there are already enough of them at the current share price.
Antha - You are talking utter pish. Consolidation reduces liquidity. It does nothing to the underlying value of the company and therefore makes it no more attractive to potential investors should he decide to attempt to raise further funds.
Only one of us has a low IQ and it isn’t me. Seeing as you seemingly aren’t smart enough to figure it out I’ll spell it out for you.
You responded to a post about the joint venture rumours on this platform and the Telegram platform asking “if anyone has any hard evidence either way”.
Putting aside the joint venture talks aren’t rumours (they have been referred to in multiple RNS’s) you started your post by saying the “telegram group is shockingly bad even for telegram groups” and then immediately stated your opinion which is not only not a fact but an outright demonstrable lie.
DCxx - I’ll give you the benefit of my doubt and assume you aren’t trolling. If you are looking for factual or rational information then any platform that allows the general pubic to post on it is the absolute last place you should be frequenting.
From the posts here that I can actually see, which given the number of posters I filter is admittedly not many, it’s apparent that nobody appears to understand that consolidation and share buy backs do not achieve the same outcome.
And by the way, it’s not only if they said what they allegedly said to the client. They are prohibited from saying anything that could be remotely construed as advice to anyone including colleagues and external parties regardless of whether they are a client or not, including acquaintances, friends and family.
Okay. You make your decisions based on the unverifiable claim that a random frontline customer call centre agent whom almost certainly knows nothing about investing (never mind being someone who should not and is not allowed under FCA rules to make statements that could be construed as advice) proffered an opinion on a company they almost certainly know nothing about.
I’m sure that strategy sets you up for positive outcomes.
“I would not make this up and no client information was ever mentioned, just in general terms of why someone would buy COPL now.”
You have changed your story already. A few minutes ago you said “They confirmed they acted on behalf of a client, whom has invested in COPL, and expects the SP to increase”.
So which is it? The client expects the share price to increase or that is the opinion of a random mystery customer service advisor (in which case that could be construed as giving advice and therefore they and Spreadex should be reported to the FCA)?
GenghisInvestor
If I was to elaborate on why posts are utter pish I wouldn’t have time to do anything else given the amount of posts on this board that are utter pish.
Anyone who isn’t a blithering idiot should understand why and anyone that doesn’t shouldn’t be investing.