Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
No I'd hold my hands up and say I got it wrong. My account isn't being deleted anytime soon.
Finally that screenshot.
It pertains to me questioning GM, because there were rumours he'd had a call with someone, and told them less than positive things about Prem.
So I then questioned GM about it, seeing as he'd told me generically all was going well. (literally all he ever told me).
He tried to contextualise it, said it was being misread. So he said, leak this: ie: him telling me his comments are being misconstrued.
There was no sharing of specific info and no planned leaking other than broad comments like his twitter post of "Things on track, don't worry." Which turned out to be untrue anyway.
My biggest failing, which I've publicly admitted, was to relay his generic positive sentiment. Now we all know it was to boost the sp as Stark were selling shares to pay for the mill ect.
And regarding the funding point. I have rephrased my message under the latest bhs video.
The 'good authority' is from talking to friends of mine in the city, who think the MRE would indeed help Prem receive some debt based funding. And I'd agree. Admittedly I could have phrased that better and I have reworded it. I'm a supply teacher, not a lawyer.
Hi,
I meant that GM ie Stark, were selling shares given to them as payment for services rendered, immediately on receipt, to offset the costs of the big ball mill. Some investors hoped they would hold onto the shares and that it would be a good sign of positive sentiment. This screenshot I made was also shared on a BizTech video.
That leak if I remember was literally him telling me, as he always did, that things were going well at site. Literally that's all. It was because someone else was saying they had spoken to him (GM) and that GM was telling people things weren't going so well. But I've not seen proof of that.
Folks I said I'd not post again but I'd like to make a few points very clear.
1. I have never used an account called Red trade, or any other previous account on twitter or telegram. I really haven't. I got into Stocks about four years ago, losing money on ridgecrest, then Gcat initial hype. Then made a tonne on Prem on paper which I saw vanish on the dip from 1p. Then I lost £18k on COPL. Now I'm close to back to a break even portfolio through averaging down on Prem. I've not seen much benefit so far from the hundreds of hours spent promoting good sentiment, articles, data, opinion, yet. But I still have the conviction that Prem will succeed and turn that around.
2. I've never actually spoken, through phone or by email (never had a response) from GR. Instead the telegram collate info from those who do. These are people who email gr, and he responds with info within market trading rules for a listed aim company. Anyone can email him! And many do.
3. Any Info I've collected from GR or GM, has always been within market rules, and guess what, when you build a relationship with these people, as I did with GM for a while, you only get the positive spin about already public info or info connected to what is already known. YOU NEVER GET ANY WIND OF ANYTHING SOUR COMING. Or at least I certainly don't.
4. Just today someone quite politely apporoched me on tg to ask if it was a good time to buy more. I was very balanced. Talked of the positives, as they are, and conversely the risks of funding issues, the sorter technology and the potentially marginal early productivity of the plant.
5. That GM 'LEAK', was him reiterating info that was in the public domain.
6. My relationship with GM fell apart immediately, because for the benefit of shareholders I leaked a message from him to the tg group saying he sold all his shares to pay for the mill. He called me the next day and said he'd not speak to me again. I said my loyalty was with Prem, not Stark and that it was important info for the community.
7. As I've said before I'm now only about £15-20k down. My motivation for my positive content is not to mislead or misinform, or to dig myself out of a terrible position. It's to share what I deem to be useful content. Yes it supports my investment and the company to a degree. But I'd be a fool to think I actually effect the share price.
8. I don't nefariously collude with Charles A, BizTech, Mark F, BHS ect. Do we share our thoufhts occasionally on Prem as a subject of interest, yes. Do we join together in darkened rooms to plan mega ramps? Grow up.
8. Finally, guys I'm really not trying to be an immoral person. There is no dark motive or deep info network at play other than a tg group with members who have a basic email rapport with GR. You could have that rapport quite easily too. Anyone can email GR or Wilna. As I say, any news one gets is related to info already in the public domain, and is NEVER FORWARNING of negative events.
Sorry for the
i remove people from the telegram group who are rude or insulting. i only remove those so negative it's a clear attempt to troll. there are other know members of the group with a far more itchy trigger finger than me, i can assure you.
with regards gm, i was fed the same crock of **** that everyone else was. my fault was believing and relaying it.
i shan't post again on lse, nor will i read some of the poisonous replys. good luck to holders of prem, and to the well intentioned, fair minded among you here.
Daz you seem to have a thing for me. But you're barking up the wrong tree with assumptions of an orchestrsted ramp with Prem. Especially when referencing Stockbox or CA, who I'm sure would not appreciate the reputational slander.
I'm a long term holder of Prem who collects info together on twitter, framed in an admittedly positive light, because I see great value and potential in the project.
Any attempts I've made to trade Prem have been largely fruitless. I'm still ~£20k down. But I'm a genuine, pretty confident lth now. I will slice @ 1p. I am not stupid enough to think my postings on twitter will markedly effect the sp. I just like learning about the sector, posting data and info and articles, supporting the company and my investment where I can.
I think the suggestion made in other groups is the potential for the video to be released in response to an RNS beforehand. And if so, the "you won't want to miss this" could be telling. Perhaps a favorable RUS ect...